10562, 10581: Complete .src.rpm after rpm --rebuild; note fixed bug; typo.

ChangeLog

@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+2000-04-07  Bart Schaefer <schaefer@zsh.org>
+
+	* 10581: Etc/BUGS, Src/Modules/zpty.c: Note a fixed bug; typo.
+
+	* Chmouel Boudjnah: 10562: Completion/Linux/_rpm: Complete
+	only .src.rpm files for "rpm --rebuild".
+
 2000-04-07  Sven Wischnowsky <wischnow@informatik.hu-berlin.de>
 
 	* 10579: Completion/Base/_arguments, Completion/Base/_values,

Completion/Linux/_rpm

@@ -70,8 +70,9 @@ _arguments -C -s \
   '--erase:*:uninstall:->uninstall' \
   -'b+[build mode (spec file)]:build stage:((p\:execute\ \%prep\ stage l\:do\ a\ list\ check c\:execute\ build\ stage i\:execute\ install\ stage b\:build\ a\ binary\ package a\:build\ binary\ and\ source\ packages)):*:build:->build_b' \
   -'t+[build mode (tar file)]:build stage:((p\:execute\ \%prep\ stage l\:do\ a\ list\ check c\:execute\ build\ stage i\:execute\ install\ stage b\:build\ a\ binary\ package a\:build\ binary\ and\ source\ packages)):*:build:->build_t' \
-  --{rebuild,rmsource,recompile,resign,addsign}':*:RPM package:->package' \
+  --{rmsource,recompile,resign,addsign}':*:RPM package:->package' \
-  '-K+[signature check mode]:*:sigcheck:->sigcheck' \
+  '--rebuild:*:Src RPM files:->package_src' \
+    '-K+[signature check mode]:*:sigcheck:->sigcheck' \
   '--checksig:*:sigcheck:->sigcheck' \
   '--rebuilddb:*:rebuild:->rebuild' && ret=0
 
@@ -201,6 +202,9 @@ while [[ -n "$state" ]]; do
 	  'prefixes:ftp URL prefix:compadd ftp://' && ret=0
     fi
     ;;
+  package_src)
+    _files -g \*.src\(\#i\).rpm
+   ;&
   tags)
     if compset -P '*%*\{'; then
       _wanted tags expl 'RPM tag' \

Etc/BUGS

@@ -2,9 +2,20 @@
 KNOWN BUGS IN ZSH
 -----------------
 
+On some terminals, display of lines with exactly 80 characters is
+problematic.  zsh assumes that the terminal does not print an extra
+newline in this case, but some terminals (e.g. aixterm) do.
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
-Completion has a habit of doing the wrong thing after a
+When interrupting code like the following with ^C:
-backslash/newline.
+  while true; do
+    sh -c '...'
+  done
+if the `sh' is executing, zsh does not know that the sh received a ^C and
+continues with the next iteration.  This happens for any program which
+handles the interrupt, then exits after tidying up; it does not happen for
+zsh, which exits directly from the signal handler.  The workaround is to
+use ^Z which forks the shell and makes the loop a separate job, then kill
+the suspended loop.
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
 If you suspend "man", zle seems to get into cooked mode.  It works ok
 for plain "less".
@@ -26,12 +37,6 @@ Then if you suspend
 % foo less something
 from zsh/bash, zle/readline gets into cooked mode.
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
-% zsh -c 'cat a_long_file | less ; :'
-can be interrupted with ^C. The prompt comes back and less is orphaned.
-If you go to the end of the file with less and cat terminates, ^C
-will not terminate less. The `; :' after less forces zsh to fork before
-executing less.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
 The pattern %?* matches names beginning with %? instead of names with at
 least two characters beginning with %. This is a hack to allow %?foo job
 substitution without quoting. This behaviour is incompatible with sh
@@ -39,3 +44,7 @@ and ksh and may be removed in the future. A good fix would be to keep
 such patterns unchanged if they do not match regardless of the state of
 the nonomatch and nullglob options.
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
+Numeric ranges are still too greedy with using characters; for example,
+<1-1000>33 will not match 633 because the 633 matches the range.  Some
+backtracking will be necessary.  (This is believed fixed as of 3.1.6.)
+------------------------------------------------------------------------

Src/Modules/zpty.c

@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ get_pty(int *master, int *slave)
     return 0;
 }
 
-#else /* ! (defined(__SVR4) || defind(sinix)) */
+#else /* ! (defined(__SVR4) || defined(sinix)) */
 
 static int
 get_pty(int *master, int *slave)