From 050783e4ae9f084dfe137d1a7ff18388ccc8165a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pav Lucistnik Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 14:58:42 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] OPTIONS - Correct the sentence about the quirk of default values. It was opposite to the reality. The example was correct, fortunately. Pointy hat is completely mine. - Remove mention of BATCH mode problems, those were fixed. --- en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.sgml | 14 ++------------ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.sgml b/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.sgml index 021857f137..ea234747f0 100644 --- a/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.sgml +++ b/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.sgml @@ -3732,9 +3732,9 @@ ${PREFIX}/man/ja/man4/baz.4.gz bsd.port.pre.mk. Due to a deficiency in the infrastructure, you can only test WITH_* variables for options, which are - ON by default, and + OFF by default, and WITHOUT_* variables for options, which - defaults to OFF. + defaults to ON. Example @@ -3758,16 +3758,6 @@ RUN_DEPENDS+= bar:${PORTSDIR}/bar/bar .include <bsd.port.post.mk> - - Brokenness - - - OPTIONS are ignored in - BATCH mode. - - - -