Further strengthen the wording of Nik's revisions for -stable, making it
very clear that this is _not_ a branch for end-users, it is for developers.
This commit is contained in:
parent
0546620270
commit
125ae35cfc
Notes:
svn2git
2020-12-08 03:00:23 +00:00
svn path=/head/; revision=10007
1 changed files with 19 additions and 14 deletions
|
@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
|||
<!--
|
||||
The FreeBSD Documentation Project
|
||||
|
||||
$FreeBSD: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cutting-edge/chapter.sgml,v 1.76 2001/07/17 23:33:26 chern Exp $
|
||||
$FreeBSD: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cutting-edge/chapter.sgml,v 1.77 2001/07/19 23:18:06 chern Exp $
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
<chapter id="cutting-edge">
|
||||
|
@ -264,26 +264,31 @@ subscribe cvs-all</programlisting>
|
|||
<title>What is &os.stable;?</title>
|
||||
<indexterm><primary>-STABLE</primary></indexterm>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>&os.stable; is our development branch for a more low-key
|
||||
and conservative set of changes intended for our next mainstream
|
||||
release. Any changes to this branch will have debuted in
|
||||
&os.current; first, helping to reduce (but not eliminate) the chance
|
||||
that the changes will cause problems.</para>
|
||||
<para>&os.stable; is our development branch from which major releases
|
||||
are made. Changes go into this branch at a different pace, and
|
||||
with the general assumption that they've first gone into
|
||||
&os.current; first for testing. This is <emphasis>still</emphasis>
|
||||
a development branch, however, and this means that at any given time,
|
||||
the sources for &os.stable; may or may not be suitable for any
|
||||
particular purpose. It is simply another engineering development
|
||||
track, not a resource for end-users.</para>
|
||||
</sect3>
|
||||
|
||||
<sect3>
|
||||
<title>Who needs &os.stable;?</title>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>If you are interested in tracking the FreeBSD development
|
||||
process, and you want early access to the features that will appear
|
||||
in the next <quote>point</quote> release of FreeBSD then you should
|
||||
<para>If you are interested in tracking or contributing to the
|
||||
FreeBSD development process, especially as it relates to the
|
||||
next <quote>point</quote> release of FreeBSD, then you should
|
||||
consider following &os.stable;.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Tracking &os.stable; also gives you easy access to security
|
||||
fixes for FreeBSD as they are released. However, you do not
|
||||
<emphasis>need</emphasis> to track &os.stable; to do this, as every
|
||||
security advisory for FreeBSD explains how to fix the problem for
|
||||
the releases it affects.</para>
|
||||
<para>While it is true that security fixes also go into the
|
||||
&os.stable; branch, you do not <emphasis>need</emphasis> to
|
||||
track &os.stable; to do this. Every security advisory for
|
||||
FreeBSD explains how to fix the problem for the releases it
|
||||
affects, and tracking an entire development branch just
|
||||
for security reasons is likely to bring in a lot of unwanted
|
||||
changes as well.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Although we endeavor to ensure that the &os.stable; branch
|
||||
compiles and runs at all times, this cannot be guaranteed. In
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue