From 1dbab63b77421e0f7b1302d0c714c8329505da82 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gabor Pali <pgj@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 10:35:31 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Update Question 7.4: - Emphasize -STABLE and -CURRENT -
 Capitalize Ports Collection

Approved by:	gabor (mentor)
---
 en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/book.sgml | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/book.sgml b/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/book.sgml
index 3acf121f12..175cb942a0 100644
--- a/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/book.sgml
+++ b/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/book.sgml
@@ -4300,18 +4300,18 @@ kern.timecounter.hardware: TSC -&gt; i8254</screen>
 
         <answer>
           <para>If you are running a FreeBSD version that lags
-            significantly behind -CURRENT or -STABLE, you may need to
-            update your ports collection; see the <ulink
+            significantly behind <emphasis>-CURRENT</emphasis> or <emphasis>-STABLE</emphasis>, you may need to
+            update your Ports Collection; see the <ulink
 	    url="&url.books.porters-handbook;/keeping-up.html">
 	    Keeping Up</ulink> section of the Porter's Handbook for further
 	    information on how to do this.
             If you are up to date,
             then someone might have committed a change to the port which
-            works for -CURRENT but which broke the port for -STABLE. Please
+            works for <emphasis>-CURRENT</emphasis> but which broke the port for <emphasis>-STABLE</emphasis>.  Please
             submit a bug report on this with the
             &man.send-pr.1; command, since the Ports
-            Collection is supposed to work for both the -CURRENT and
-            -STABLE branches.</para>
+            Collection is supposed to work for both the <emphasis>-CURRENT</emphasis> and
+            <emphasis>-STABLE</emphasis> branches.</para>
         </answer>
       </qandaentry>