Recommend my new Lieblingcdromlaufwerke, the Plasmon PX-12CS.
This commit is contained in:
parent
fa2da5a7b5
commit
33e0c3d47c
Notes:
svn2git
2020-12-08 03:00:23 +00:00
svn path=/head/; revision=711
1 changed files with 13 additions and 10 deletions
|
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
|||
<!-- $Id: hw.sgml,v 1.47 1996-10-29 03:28:04 alex Exp $ -->
|
||||
<!-- $Id: hw.sgml,v 1.48 1996-11-27 01:06:40 jkh Exp $ -->
|
||||
<!-- The FreeBSD Documentation Project -->
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
|
@ -131,17 +131,20 @@ Slippery when wet. Beware of dog.
|
|||
of multiuser disk I/O.
|
||||
|
||||
<sect2><heading>CDROM drives</heading>
|
||||
<p>My SCSI preferences extend to SCSI CDROM drives as well, and the
|
||||
<htmlurl url="http://www.toshiba.com" name="Toshiba"> XM-3501B (now
|
||||
<p>My SCSI preferences extend to SCSI CDROM drives as well, and while
|
||||
the <htmlurl url="http://www.toshiba.com" name="Toshiba"> XM-3501B (also
|
||||
released in a caddy-less model called the XM-5401B) drive has always
|
||||
performed well for me. Generally speaking, most SCSI CDROM drives I've
|
||||
seen have been of pretty solid construction (probably because they don't
|
||||
occupy the lower end of the market, due to their higher price) and you
|
||||
probably won't go wrong with an HP or NEC SCSI CDROM drive either.
|
||||
performed well for me, I'm now a great fan of the <htmlurl
|
||||
url="http://www.plasmon.com" name="Plasmon"> PX-12CS drive. It's
|
||||
a 12 speed drive with excellent performance and reliability.
|
||||
|
||||
NOTE: SCSI CDROM prices appear to have dropped considerably in the
|
||||
last few months and are now quite competetive with IDE CDROMs while
|
||||
remaining the technically superior solution.
|
||||
<p>Generally speaking, most SCSI CDROM drives I've seen have been of
|
||||
pretty solid construction and you probably won't go wrong with an HP or
|
||||
NEC SCSI CDROM drive either. SCSI CDROM prices also appear to have
|
||||
dropped considerably in the last few months and are now quite competetive
|
||||
with IDE CDROMs while remaining a technically superior solution. I now see
|
||||
no reason whatsoever to settle for an IDE CDROM drive if given a choice
|
||||
between the two.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
<sect2><heading>CD Recordable (WORM) drives</heading>
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue