From 4296e9bb3a40818fc191517995e7d108b19c1123 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Murray Stokely Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 21:28:05 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Spellcheck. --- en/events/2002/bsdcon-devsummit.sgml | 14 +++++++------- en/events/2002/usenix-devsummit.sgml | 6 +++--- en/projects/c99/index.sgml | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/en/events/2002/bsdcon-devsummit.sgml b/en/events/2002/bsdcon-devsummit.sgml index 95f9db002c..0648fb2a41 100644 --- a/en/events/2002/bsdcon-devsummit.sgml +++ b/en/events/2002/bsdcon-devsummit.sgml @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ - + @@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ gets called which passes a version to the api to check it. Another thing you get from init.

-

In the solaris case there is a single number. How do I automate +

In the Solaris case there is a single number. How do I automate that versioning check with more interfaces?

Paul : I don't think we should @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@

Justin : The only saving grace is that the transition can be mechanical.

-

PoulHK : Why not a compatability +

PoulHK : Why not a compatibility layer while doing conversion?

Justin : Sure and then you could @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@

PowerPC - Benno Rice

-

Has now commited the page map code with something more sane. Has +

Has now committed the page map code with something more sane. Has also got the system to the point where it tries to mount root. Turning on invariants blows it up. Hoping to get to single user in a month or so on the simulator. With some luck we may get to @@ -1257,7 +1257,7 @@

Robert : I can't say. Part of our contract was to release as open source.

-

Alfred : About compatability. How +

Alfred : About compatibility. How compatible are we with others?

Robert : We've tried to follow the @@ -1528,7 +1528,7 @@

John : Current Status cont. We've taken more time to get it right. We've added common things like semaphores, reader writer locks. I've been making the kernel - fully pre-emptible. I've commited half of this to current now. The + fully pre-emptible. I've committed half of this to current now. The ktrace is another infrastructural issue so its feasible.

David : Then general framework @@ -1686,7 +1686,7 @@

Doug : I don't know how tied you are to the release schedule. If you want to spend all of October polishing. If we go backwards from October we can do Release 1 on - May 15. April 1st is too soon and puts you in weird catagories + May 15. April 1st is too soon and puts you in weird categories relative to Usenix.

Murray : The way we have it set up diff --git a/en/events/2002/usenix-devsummit.sgml b/en/events/2002/usenix-devsummit.sgml index 3b720e78f9..caa61f6e3c 100644 --- a/en/events/2002/usenix-devsummit.sgml +++ b/en/events/2002/usenix-devsummit.sgml @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ - +

BREAK
'> @@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ it might be reasonable then to take the space hit and always have the debugging in but turn it on and off with sysctl.

rwatson : We should commit an optimized -kernel configuration and benchmarking guidlines to the tree as +kernel configuration and benchmarking guidelines to the tree as well.

@@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ look like? Different architectures and different numbers of processors.

rwatson : Can we make a multi-processor -run uni-procesor.

+run uni-processor.

alfred : Run queue and scheduler stuff?

diff --git a/en/projects/c99/index.sgml b/en/projects/c99/index.sgml index 5c2ce4a728..573f929762 100644 --- a/en/projects/c99/index.sgml +++ b/en/projects/c99/index.sgml @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ - + %includes; @@ -1928,7 +1928,7 @@