os/doc
3
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Be more rhetorically accurate when describing FFS.

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Robert Watson 2010-03-09 10:54:26 +00:00
parent 642afba913
commit 441902ff3b
Notes: svn2git 2020-12-08 03:00:23 +00:00 
svn path=/www/; revision=35477
1 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

8
en/projects/ideas/ideas.xml
View file

@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ Ideas//EN"
<ideas>
<cvs:keywords xmlns:cvs="http://www.FreeBSD.org/XML/CVS" version="1.0">
<cvs:keyword name="freebsd">
$FreeBSD: www/en/projects/ideas/ideas.xml,v 1.141 2010/03/09 09:12:55 rwatson Exp $
$FreeBSD: www/en/projects/ideas/ideas.xml,v 1.142 2010/03/09 10:04:51 rwatson Exp $
</cvs:keyword>
</cvs:keywords>
@ -162,9 +162,9 @@ these buses to be a subclass of this new base class.</p>
<idea id="colocation">
<title>Implement co-location for UFS2</title>
<desc><p>While FreeBSD's FFS implementation is pretty much
state-of-the-art, in addition to softupdates, Greg Granger <a
href="http://www.ece.cmu.edu/~ganger/papers/cffs.html">proposed</a>
<desc><p>While FreeBSD's FFS includes many advanced features, such as
snapshots and soft updates, Greg Granger <a
href="http://www.ece.cmu.edu/~ganger/papers/cffs.html">has proposed</a>
other strategies that would be useful, especially when working
with small files. Quoting Greg Ganger: "The key insight for why
current file systems perform poorly is that locality is insufficient