From 5caa8e243ae48fca39d67c442da0fd38c8c8b020 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mathieu Arnold Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 11:30:00 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Add a second paragraph on what pkg-descr should be. Sponsored by: Absolight --- .../books/porters-handbook/quick-porting/chapter.xml | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/quick-porting/chapter.xml b/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/quick-porting/chapter.xml index 757cb0f674..279c1c62da 100644 --- a/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/quick-porting/chapter.xml +++ b/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/quick-porting/chapter.xml @@ -101,6 +101,12 @@ COMMENT= Cat chasing a mouse all over the screen are in an awkward format. For example, manpages have justified spacing, which looks particularly bad with monospaced fonts. + + On the other hand, the content of + pkg-descr must be longer than the COMMENT + line from the Makefile. It must explain in more depth what + the port is all about. A well-written pkg-descr describes