Numerous changes by Jordan.
Submitted by: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@freebsd.org>backups/projects/sgml2xml@41712
John Fieber
29 years ago
parent
81b693cafa
commit
6c17a81d0e
Notes:
svn2git
3 years ago
svn path=/head/; revision=25
@ -1,44 +1,95 @@
|
||||
<!-- $Id: history.sgml,v 1.2 1995-06-30 17:37:38 jfieber Exp $ -->
|
||||
<!-- $Id: history.sgml,v 1.3 1995-07-07 22:25:51 jfieber Exp $ -->
|
||||
<!-- The FreeBSD Documentation Project -->
|
||||
|
||||
<sect><heading>A brief history of FreeBSD<label id="history"></heading>
|
||||
<sect><heading>A brief history of FreeBSD, according to Jordan Hubbard<label id="history"></heading>
|
||||
|
||||
<p><em>Contributed by &a.jkh;</em>.
|
||||
|
||||
The FreeBSD project was started somewhere in the early part of 1992 as
|
||||
an outgrowth of the "Unofficial 386BSD Patchkit" by the patchkit's
|
||||
last 3 coordinators: Nate Williams, Jordan Hubbard and Rod Grimes.
|
||||
The FreeBSD project had its genesis in the early part of 1992,
|
||||
partially as an outgrowth of the "Unofficial 386BSD Patchkit" by the
|
||||
patchkit's last 3 coordinators: Nate Williams, Rod Grimes and myself.
|
||||
David Greenman and Julian Elischer were also lurking in the background
|
||||
around this time, though they didn't come fully into the project until
|
||||
a month or two after it was more or less officially launched. The
|
||||
original working title of the project was also "386BSD 0.5" or "386BSD
|
||||
Interim", a reference to the fact that the original goal was to
|
||||
produce an intermediate snapshot of 386BSD.
|
||||
|
||||
386BSD was Bill Jolitz's operating system, which had been up to
|
||||
that point suffering rather severely from neglect, a consequence
|
||||
of which was to cause the patchkit to swell ever more
|
||||
uncomfortably with each passing day. The 3 ex-patchkit
|
||||
coordinators were all in agreement that the patchkit had to die.
|
||||
It was rapidly outliving its usefulness, and it would be a far
|
||||
easier thing to simply do another 386BSD release with all patches
|
||||
applied and a number of its aging utilities updated.
|
||||
|
||||
These plans came to a rude halt when Bill Jolitz suddenly decided
|
||||
to withdraw his sanction from the project. It didn't take the
|
||||
team members long to decide that the goal remained worthwhile
|
||||
even without Bill's support, and so they adopted the name
|
||||
"FreeBSD", which was coined by David Greenman.
|
||||
|
||||
Once it also became clear that the project was on the road to
|
||||
perhaps even becoming a reality, Jordan Hubbard contacted Walnut
|
||||
Creek CDROM with an eye towards improving FreeBSD's distribution
|
||||
channels to those many unfortunates without easy access to the
|
||||
Internet. Walnut Creek CDROM not only supported the idea of
|
||||
distributing FreeBSD on CD, but went so far as to provide the
|
||||
project with a machine to work on and a fast Internet connection.
|
||||
Without Walnut Creek CDROM's almost unprecidented degree of faith
|
||||
in what was, at the time, a completely unknown project, it is
|
||||
very unlikely that FreeBSD would have gotten as far, as fast, as
|
||||
it has today.
|
||||
a month or two after it was more or less officially launched. Our
|
||||
original goal was to produce an intermediate snapshot of 386BSD in
|
||||
order to fix a number of problems with it that the patchkit mechanism
|
||||
just wasn't capable of solving. Some of you may remember the early
|
||||
working title for the project being "386BSD 0.5" or "386BSD Interim"
|
||||
in reference to that fact.
|
||||
|
||||
386BSD was Bill Jolitz's operating system, which had been up to that
|
||||
point suffering rather severely from almost a year's worth of neglect.
|
||||
As the patchkit swelled ever more uncomfortably with each passing day,
|
||||
we were in unanimous agreement that something had to be done and
|
||||
decided to try and assist Bill by providing this interim "cleanup"
|
||||
snapshot. Those plans came to a rude halt when Bill Jolitz suddenly
|
||||
decided to withdraw his sanction from the project and without any
|
||||
clear indication of what would be done instead (and it was, in fact,
|
||||
to be another full year before he was even heard from in public
|
||||
again!).
|
||||
|
||||
It didn't take us long to decide that the goal remained worthwhile
|
||||
even without Bill's support, and so we adopted the name "FreeBSD",
|
||||
which was coined by David Greenman. Our initial objectives were set
|
||||
after consulting with the system's current users and once it became
|
||||
clear that the project was on the road to perhaps even becoming a
|
||||
reality, I contacted Walnut Creek CDROM with an eye towards improving
|
||||
FreeBSD's distribution channels to those many unfortunates without
|
||||
easy access to the Internet. Walnut Creek CDROM not only supported
|
||||
the idea of distributing FreeBSD on CD but went so far as to provide
|
||||
the project with a machine to work on and a fast Internet connection.
|
||||
Without Walnut Creek CDROM's almost unprecidented degree of faith in
|
||||
what was, at the time, a completely unknown project, it is in fact
|
||||
very unlikely that FreeBSD would have gotten as far, as fast, as it
|
||||
has today.
|
||||
|
||||
The first CDROM (and general net-wide) distribution was FreeBSD 1.0,
|
||||
released in December of '93. This was based on the 4.3 BSD Lite
|
||||
("Net/2") tape from U.C. Berkeley with many components provided by
|
||||
386BSD and the Free Software Foundation. It was a fairly reasonable
|
||||
success for a first offering, and we followed this release with the
|
||||
highly successful FreeBSD 1.1 version in May of 1994.
|
||||
|
||||
Around this time, some rather unexpected storm clouds formed on our
|
||||
horizon as Novell and U.C. Berkeley settled their long-running lawsuit
|
||||
over the legal status of the Berkeley Net/2 tape. A condition of that
|
||||
settlement was U.C. Berkeley's concession that large parts of Net/2
|
||||
was "encumbered" code and property of Novell, who had in turn aquired
|
||||
it from AT&T some time previously. What Berkeley got in return was
|
||||
Novell's "blessing" that the 4.4 Lite release, when it was finally
|
||||
released, would be declared unencumbered and all existing Net/2 users
|
||||
would be strongly encouraged to switch. This included us, and we were
|
||||
given until the end of July 1994 to stop shipping our own Net/2 based
|
||||
product. Under the terms of that agreement, were were allowed one
|
||||
last release before the deadline and that became FreeBSD 1.1.5.1, the
|
||||
culmination of our year's work with Net/2 and generally considered by
|
||||
many to be a significant project milestone for stability and general
|
||||
performance..
|
||||
|
||||
We then set about the arduous task of literally re-inventing ourselves
|
||||
with a completely new and rather incomplete set of 4.4 Lite bits. The
|
||||
"Lite" releases were light in part because Berkeley's CSRG removed
|
||||
large chunks of code required for actually making a bootable running
|
||||
system out of it due to various legal requirements and the fact that
|
||||
the Intel port of 4.4 was highly incomplete. It took us until
|
||||
December of 1994 to make this transition, and in January of 1995 we
|
||||
released FreeBSD 2.0 to the net and on CDROM. Despite being still
|
||||
more than a little rough around the edges, the release was a
|
||||
significant success and has since been followed by the more robust and
|
||||
easier to install FreeBSD 2.0.5 release in June of 1995.
|
||||
|
||||
Where to from here? Well, we intend to release FreeBSD 2.1 sometime
|
||||
in September of 1995 and have reasonable expectations that it will
|
||||
meet or exceed all of the standards for quality we set with FreeBSD
|
||||
1.1.5.1 back in July of 1994. From there, we'll probably go to a
|
||||
two-track scheme with a "stable" branch of FreeBSD and an
|
||||
"experimental" branch, where development can continue at its usually
|
||||
rapid pace without penalizing those who just want a stable, working
|
||||
system without too much excitement. We also intend to focus on any
|
||||
remaining areas of weakness, like documentation or missing drivers,
|
||||
and steadily increase the overall quality and feature set of the
|
||||
system well into 1996 and beyond.
|
||||
|
||||
Jordan
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue