diff --git a/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/news/status/report-2015-10-2015-12.xml b/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/news/status/report-2015-10-2015-12.xml index 7d8cbe32f8..98fc6ec511 100644 --- a/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/news/status/report-2015-10-2015-12.xml +++ b/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/news/status/report-2015-10-2015-12.xml @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@
LKL ("Linux Kernel as a Library") is a special "architecture" of the full Linux kernel that builds as a userspace library on various platforms, including &os;. One - application of such a library is using Linux's filesystem drivers + application of such a library is using Linux filesystem drivers to implement a FUSE backend.
fusefs-lkl's lklfuse binary is such a FUSE @@ -112,14 +112,14 @@ BTRFS read-write, using the native drivers from Linux.
-The sysutils/fusefs-lkl port may now be installed from +
sysutils/fusefs-lkl can now be installed either from packages or ports, providing access to these filesystems on &os; via FUSE.
I recently became involved with &os; (as in, the last 2-3 weeks), and found myself quickly involved with Ports development. - What quickly struck me was the difficulty in providing a Python + What struck me immediately was the difficulty in providing a Python package that was depended upon by multiple versions of Python. As it turns out, poudriere can currently only generate one package per port, meaning that a Python version-neutral (compatible with @@ -959,7 +959,7 @@
I discussed the issue with &a.koobs;, who suggested that I look into implementing a "variants protocol" within the - Ports framework and the necessary changes to poudriere in order to + Ports framework and the necessary changes to poudriere to allow a port to generate more than one package.
Support for variants is strongly needed in Ports and @@ -994,8 +994,8 @@ in my heels and have implemented a proof-of-concept implementation of variants in the Ports framework, including the necessary modifications to poudriere in order to support it. It was mildly - upsetting to find that poudriere is mostly written in Bourne shell - scripts, but press on I did nonetheless.
+ upsettling to find that poudriere is mostly written in Bourne shell + scripts, but I pressed on nonetheless.I started with the @@ -1007,7 +1007,7 @@ changes.
This is a work in progress, and I would - love to hear your feedback. I've enjoyed my first few weeks + love to hear your feedback. I have enjoyed my first few weeks working on &os;, and I hope to stay here for quite some time.