Pull a footnote out of an <informaltable> and into a <note> at the end

of the table, to work around a JadeTeX bug.
This commit is contained in:
Nik Clayton 1999-01-27 23:32:48 +00:00
parent 6c56672923
commit 829eb2cc4b
Notes: svn2git 2020-12-08 03:00:23 +00:00
svn path=/head/; revision=4137
3 changed files with 54 additions and 51 deletions
en/handbook/hw
en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/hw
en_US.ISO_8859-1/books/handbook/hw

View file

@ -1683,23 +1683,7 @@ INS8250 -&gt; INS8250B
<row>
<entry>National</entry>
<entry>(PC16550DV)</entry>
<entry>0<footnote>
<para>To date, the author of this document has not
found any non-National parts that report zero
differences using the COMTEST program. It should
also be noted that National has had five versions
of the 16550 over the years and the newest parts
behave a bit differently than the classic
NS16550AFN that is considered the benchmark for
functionality. COMTEST appears to turn a blind eye
to the differences within the National product
line and reports no errors on the National parts
(except for the original 16550) even when there
are official erratas that describe bugs in the A,
B and C revisions of the parts, so this bias in
COMTEST must be taken into account.</para>
</footnote>
</entry>
<entry>0</entry>
</row>
<row>
@ -1748,6 +1732,23 @@ INS8250 -&gt; INS8250B
</tbody>
</tgroup>
</informaltable>
<note>
<para>To date, the author of this document has not
found any non-National parts that report zero
differences using the COMTEST program. It should
also be noted that National has had five versions
of the 16550 over the years and the newest parts
behave a bit differently than the classic
NS16550AFN that is considered the benchmark for
functionality. COMTEST appears to turn a blind eye
to the differences within the National product
line and reports no errors on the National parts
(except for the original 16550) even when there
are official erratas that describe bugs in the A,
B and C revisions of the parts, so this bias in
COMTEST must be taken into account.</para>
</note>
<para>It is important to understand that a simple count of
differences from COMTEST does not reveal a lot about what

View file

@ -1683,23 +1683,7 @@ INS8250 -&gt; INS8250B
<row>
<entry>National</entry>
<entry>(PC16550DV)</entry>
<entry>0<footnote>
<para>To date, the author of this document has not
found any non-National parts that report zero
differences using the COMTEST program. It should
also be noted that National has had five versions
of the 16550 over the years and the newest parts
behave a bit differently than the classic
NS16550AFN that is considered the benchmark for
functionality. COMTEST appears to turn a blind eye
to the differences within the National product
line and reports no errors on the National parts
(except for the original 16550) even when there
are official erratas that describe bugs in the A,
B and C revisions of the parts, so this bias in
COMTEST must be taken into account.</para>
</footnote>
</entry>
<entry>0</entry>
</row>
<row>
@ -1748,6 +1732,23 @@ INS8250 -&gt; INS8250B
</tbody>
</tgroup>
</informaltable>
<note>
<para>To date, the author of this document has not
found any non-National parts that report zero
differences using the COMTEST program. It should
also be noted that National has had five versions
of the 16550 over the years and the newest parts
behave a bit differently than the classic
NS16550AFN that is considered the benchmark for
functionality. COMTEST appears to turn a blind eye
to the differences within the National product
line and reports no errors on the National parts
(except for the original 16550) even when there
are official erratas that describe bugs in the A,
B and C revisions of the parts, so this bias in
COMTEST must be taken into account.</para>
</note>
<para>It is important to understand that a simple count of
differences from COMTEST does not reveal a lot about what

View file

@ -1683,23 +1683,7 @@ INS8250 -&gt; INS8250B
<row>
<entry>National</entry>
<entry>(PC16550DV)</entry>
<entry>0<footnote>
<para>To date, the author of this document has not
found any non-National parts that report zero
differences using the COMTEST program. It should
also be noted that National has had five versions
of the 16550 over the years and the newest parts
behave a bit differently than the classic
NS16550AFN that is considered the benchmark for
functionality. COMTEST appears to turn a blind eye
to the differences within the National product
line and reports no errors on the National parts
(except for the original 16550) even when there
are official erratas that describe bugs in the A,
B and C revisions of the parts, so this bias in
COMTEST must be taken into account.</para>
</footnote>
</entry>
<entry>0</entry>
</row>
<row>
@ -1748,6 +1732,23 @@ INS8250 -&gt; INS8250B
</tbody>
</tgroup>
</informaltable>
<note>
<para>To date, the author of this document has not
found any non-National parts that report zero
differences using the COMTEST program. It should
also be noted that National has had five versions
of the 16550 over the years and the newest parts
behave a bit differently than the classic
NS16550AFN that is considered the benchmark for
functionality. COMTEST appears to turn a blind eye
to the differences within the National product
line and reports no errors on the National parts
(except for the original 16550) even when there
are official erratas that describe bugs in the A,
B and C revisions of the parts, so this bias in
COMTEST must be taken into account.</para>
</note>
<para>It is important to understand that a simple count of
differences from COMTEST does not reveal a lot about what