From 83ea11e809f603208f07b905c2ae01d962ba3fbd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dima Dorfman
GPL. This license is - not quite as popular with us due to the amount of extra effort - demanded of anyone using the code for commercial purposes, but - given the sheer quantity of GPL'd code we currently require - (compiler, assembler, text formatter, etc) it would be silly to - refuse additional contributions under this license. Code under - the GPL also goes into a different part of the tree, that being -
GPL. + This license is not quite as popular with us due to the amount + of extra effort demanded of anyone using the code for + commercial purposes, but given the sheer quantity of GPL'd code + we currently require (compiler, assembler, text formatter, etc) + it would be silly to refuse additional contributions under this + license. Code under the GPL also goes into a different part of + the tree, that being
GPL. This license is - not quite as popular with us due to the amount of extra effort - demanded of anyone using the code for commercial purposes, but - given the sheer quantity of GPL'd code we currently require - (compiler, assembler, text formatter, etc) it would be silly to - refuse additional contributions under this license. Code under - the GPL also goes into a different part of the tree, that being -
GPL. + This license is not quite as popular with us due to the amount + of extra effort demanded of anyone using the code for + commercial purposes, but given the sheer quantity of GPL'd code + we currently require (compiler, assembler, text formatter, etc) + it would be silly to refuse additional contributions under this + license. Code under the GPL also goes into a different part of + the tree, that being