The warning about labeling a full UFS filesystem possibly causing data
corruption appears to confuse UFS labels with glabel(8) generic labels. UFS labels are part of the metadata and do not overwrite the filesystem data. Discussed on IRC with emaste and bsdimp.
This commit is contained in:
parent
009d0c356e
commit
8731c089d9
Notes:
svn2git
2020-12-08 03:00:23 +00:00
svn path=/head/; revision=48356
1 changed files with 0 additions and 5 deletions
|
@ -1473,11 +1473,6 @@ ggate0
|
|||
|
||||
<screen>&prompt.root; <userinput>tunefs -L <replaceable>home</replaceable> <replaceable>/dev/da3</replaceable></userinput></screen>
|
||||
|
||||
<warning>
|
||||
<para>If the file system is full, this may cause data
|
||||
corruption.</para>
|
||||
</warning>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>A label should now exist in <filename>/dev/ufs</filename>
|
||||
which may be added to <filename>/etc/fstab</filename>:</para>
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue