New section about SCSI hard drives. Not that I'm an expert or anything,
but it was embarrassing to leave that entry empty!
This commit is contained in:
parent
6142308768
commit
9342cdbb34
Notes:
svn2git
2020-12-08 03:00:23 +00:00
svn path=/head/; revision=2453
4 changed files with 134 additions and 5 deletions
|
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
|||
# $Id: Makefile,v 1.28 1997-11-18 16:06:04 wosch Exp $
|
||||
# $Id: Makefile,v 1.29 1998-02-19 06:45:26 asami Exp $
|
||||
|
||||
SGMLOPTS=-links
|
||||
SRCS= authors.sgml basics.sgml bibliography.sgml boothelp.sgml
|
||||
|
@ -12,7 +12,8 @@ SRCS+= lists.sgml mail.sgml memoryuse.sgml
|
|||
SRCS+= mirrors.sgml nfs.sgml nutshell.sgml pgpkeys.sgml policies.sgml
|
||||
SRCS+= porting.sgml ports.sgml ppp.sgml printing.sgml
|
||||
SRCS+= quotas.sgml relnotes.sgml routing.sgml russian.sgml
|
||||
SRCS+= serial.sgml scsi.sgml sections.sgml sio.sgml skey.sgml slipc.sgml
|
||||
SRCS+= serial.sgml scsi.sgml scsihd.sgml
|
||||
SRCS+= sections.sgml sio.sgml skey.sgml slipc.sgml
|
||||
SRCS+= slips.sgml stable.sgml submitters.sgml synching.sgml
|
||||
SRCS+= term.sgml userppp.sgml uart.sgml linuxemu.sgml
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
|||
<!-- $Id: hw.sgml,v 1.78 1997-12-29 16:34:30 asami Exp $ -->
|
||||
<!-- $Id: hw.sgml,v 1.79 1998-02-19 06:45:27 asami Exp $ -->
|
||||
<!-- The FreeBSD Documentation Project -->
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
|
@ -451,7 +451,11 @@ Slippery when wet. Beware of dog.
|
|||
<sect2><heading>* IDE</heading>
|
||||
<sect2><heading>* Floppy</heading>
|
||||
|
||||
<sect1><heading>* Hard drives</heading>
|
||||
<sect1><heading> Hard drives</heading>
|
||||
&scsihd;
|
||||
|
||||
<sect2><heading>* IDE hard drives</heading>
|
||||
|
||||
<sect1><heading> Tape drives</heading>
|
||||
<p><em>Contributed by &a.jmb;.<newline>2 July 1996.</em></p>
|
||||
<sect2><heading> General tape access commands</heading>
|
||||
|
|
123
handbook/scsihd.sgml
Normal file
123
handbook/scsihd.sgml
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
|
|||
<!-- $Id -->
|
||||
<!-- The FreeBSD Documentation Project -->
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
<!DOCTYPE chapt PUBLIC "-//FreeBSD//DTD linuxdoc//EN"> -->
|
||||
|
||||
<sect2><heading> SCSI hard drives</heading>
|
||||
<p><em>Contributed by &a.asami;.<newline>17 February 1998.</em></p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>As mentioned in the <ref id="scsi" name="SCSI"> section,
|
||||
virtually all SCSI hard drives sold today are SCSI-2 compliant
|
||||
and thus will work fine as long as you connect them to a
|
||||
supported SCSI host adapter. Most problems people encounter
|
||||
are either due to badly designed cabling (cable too long,
|
||||
star topology, etc.), insufficient termination, or defective
|
||||
parts. Please refer to the <ref id="scsi" name="SCSI">
|
||||
section first if your SCSI hard drive is not working.
|
||||
However, there are a couple of things you may want to take
|
||||
into account before you purchase SCSI hard drives for your
|
||||
system.
|
||||
|
||||
<sect3><heading> Rotational speed</heading>
|
||||
<p>Rotational speeds of SCSI drives sold today range from around
|
||||
4,500RPM to 10,000RPM. Most of them are either 5,400RPM or
|
||||
7,200RPM. Even though the 7,200RPM drives can generally
|
||||
transfer data faster, they run considerably hotter than their
|
||||
5,400RPM counterparts. A large fraction of today's disk drive
|
||||
malfunctions are heat-related. If you do not have very good
|
||||
cooling in your PC case, you may want to stick with 5,400RPM
|
||||
or slower drives.
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Note that newer drives, with higher areal recording
|
||||
densities, can deliver much more bits per rotation than older
|
||||
ones. Today's top-of-line 5,400RPM drives can sustain a
|
||||
throughput comparable to 7,200RPM drives of one or two model
|
||||
generations ago. The number to find on the spec sheet for
|
||||
bandwidth is "internal data (or transfer) rate". It is
|
||||
usually in megabits/sec so divide it by 8 and you'll get the
|
||||
rough approximation of how much megabytes/sec you can get out
|
||||
of the drive.
|
||||
|
||||
<p>(If you are a speed maniac and want a 10,000RPM drive for
|
||||
your cute little peecee, be my guest; however, those drives
|
||||
become extremely hot. Don't even think about it if you don't
|
||||
have a fan blowing air <em>directly at</em> the drive or a
|
||||
properly ventilated disk enclosure.)
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Obviously, the latest 10,000RPM drives and 7,200RPM drives
|
||||
can deliver more data than the latest 5,400RPM drives, so if
|
||||
absolute bandwidth is the necessity for your applications, you
|
||||
have little choice but to get the faster drives. Also, if you
|
||||
need low latency, faster drives are better; not only do they
|
||||
usually have lower average seek times, but also the rotational
|
||||
delay is one place where slow-spinning drives can never beat a
|
||||
faster one. (The average rotational latency is half the time
|
||||
it takes to rotate the drive once; thus, it's 3 milliseconds
|
||||
for 10,000RPM drives, 4.2ms for 7,200RPM drives and 5.6ms for
|
||||
5,400RPM drives.) Latency is seek time plus rotational delay.
|
||||
Make sure you understand whether you need low latency or more
|
||||
accesses per second, though; in the latter case (e.g., news
|
||||
servers), it may not be optimal to purchase one big fast
|
||||
drive. You can achieve similar or even better results by
|
||||
using the ccd (concatenated disk) driver to create a striped
|
||||
disk array out of multiple slower drives for comparable
|
||||
overall cost.
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Make sure you have adequate air flow around the drive,
|
||||
especially if you are going to use a fast-spinning drive. You
|
||||
generally need at least 1/2" (1.25cm) of spacing above and
|
||||
below a drive. Understand how the air flows through your PC
|
||||
case. Most cases have the power supply suck the air out of
|
||||
the back. See where the air flows in, and put the drive where
|
||||
it will have the largest volume of cool air flowing around it.
|
||||
You may need to seal some unwanted holes or add a new fan for
|
||||
effective cooling.
|
||||
|
||||
<p>Another consideration is noise. Many 7,200 or faster drives
|
||||
generate a high-pitched whine which is quite unpleasant to
|
||||
most people. That, plus the extra fans often required for
|
||||
cooling, may make 7,200 or faster drives unsuitable for some
|
||||
office and home environments.
|
||||
|
||||
<sect3><heading> Form factor</heading>
|
||||
<p>Most SCSI drives sold today are of 3.5" form factor. They
|
||||
come in two different heights; 1.6" ("half-height") or 1"
|
||||
("low-profile"). The half-height drive is the same height as a
|
||||
CD-ROM drive. However, don't forget the spacing rule
|
||||
mentioned in the previous section. If you have three standard
|
||||
3.5" drive bays, you will not be able to put three half-height
|
||||
drives in there (without frying them, that is).
|
||||
|
||||
<sect3><heading> Interface</heading>
|
||||
<p>The majority of SCSI hard drives sold today are Ultra or
|
||||
Ultra-wide SCSI. The maximum bandwidth of Ultra SCSI is
|
||||
20MB/sec, and Ultra-wide SCSI is 40MB/sec. There is no
|
||||
difference in max cable length between Ultra and Ultra-wide;
|
||||
however, the more devices you have on the same bus, the sooner
|
||||
you will start having bus integrity problems. Unless you have
|
||||
a well-designed disk enclosure, it is not easy to make more
|
||||
than 5 or 6 Ultra SCSI drives work on a single bus.
|
||||
|
||||
<p>On the other hand, if you need to connect many drives, going
|
||||
for Fast-wide SCSI may not be a bad idea. That will have the
|
||||
same max bandwidth as Ultra (narrow) SCSI, while
|
||||
electronically it's much easier to get it "right". My advice
|
||||
would be: if you want to connect many disks, get wide SCSI
|
||||
drives; they usually cost a little more but it may save you
|
||||
down the road. (Besides, if you can't afford the cost
|
||||
difference, you shouldn't be building a disk array.)
|
||||
|
||||
<p>There are two variant of wide SCSI drives; 68-pin and 80-pin
|
||||
SCA (Single Connector Attach). The SCA drives don't have a
|
||||
separate 4-pin power connector, and also read the SCSI ID
|
||||
settings through the 80-pin connector. If you are really
|
||||
serious about building a large storage system, get SCA
|
||||
drives and a good SCA enclosure (dual power supply with at
|
||||
least one extra fan). They are more electronically sound than
|
||||
68-pin counterparts because there is no "stub" of the SCSI bus
|
||||
inside the disk canister as in arrays built from 68-pin
|
||||
drives. They are easier to install too (you just need to
|
||||
screw the drive in the canister, instead of trying to squeeze
|
||||
in your fingers in a tight place to hook up all the little
|
||||
cables (like the SCSI ID and disk activity LED lines).
|
|
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
|||
<!-- $Id: sections.sgml,v 1.26 1997-11-18 16:06:09 wosch Exp $ -->
|
||||
<!-- $Id: sections.sgml,v 1.27 1998-02-19 06:45:30 asami Exp $ -->
|
||||
<!-- The FreeBSD Documentation Project -->
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- Entities containing all the pieces of the handbook are -->
|
||||
|
@ -51,6 +51,7 @@
|
|||
<!ENTITY russian SYSTEM "russian.sgml">
|
||||
<!ENTITY serial SYSTEM "serial.sgml">
|
||||
<!ENTITY scsi SYSTEM "scsi.sgml">
|
||||
<!ENTITY scsihd SYSTEM "scsihd.sgml">
|
||||
<!ENTITY sio SYSTEM "sio.sgml">
|
||||
<!ENTITY cy SYSTEM "cyclades.sgml">
|
||||
<!ENTITY skey SYSTEM "skey.sgml">
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue