os/doc
3
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Although 'Unanimous Consent' appears to be a well defined and used in

Browse source 
the US Senate, Canadian Parliament and Australian Senate, it was
causing some confusion.  After some consultation with Mark Murray,
change this to 'without objection' since often times a plain-speaking
term is preferable to a regionally used term.

Also, clarify that this procedure is to be used when for more mundane
matters that need a sanity check, but don't need the whole, ponderous
voting proceedure that more difficult issues require.  Core members
that read email in any given 48 hour period are trusted enough to know
the difference and to provide the sanity check as necessary.

Reviewed by: markm
This commit is contained in:
Warner Losh 2003-12-14 23:01:56 +00:00
parent f4375883ac
commit a30ef3ecab
Notes: svn2git 2020-12-08 03:00:23 +00:00 
svn path=/www/; revision=19190
1 changed files with 18 additions and 16 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

34
en/internal/core-vote.sgml
View file

@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" [ <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" [
<!ENTITY base CDATA ".."> <!ENTITY base CDATA "..">
<!ENTITY date "$FreeBSD: www/en/internal/core-vote.sgml,v 1.2 2003/04/20 21:10:05 murray Exp $"> <!ENTITY date "$FreeBSD: www/en/internal/core-vote.sgml,v 1.3 2003/12/13 04:52:45 imp Exp $">
<!ENTITY title "Core's Voting Procedures"> <!ENTITY title "Core's Voting Procedures">
<!ENTITY % includes SYSTEM "../includes.sgml"> %includes; <!ENTITY % includes SYSTEM "../includes.sgml"> %includes;
]> ]>
@ -54,27 +54,29 @@
etc.</li> etc.</li>
</ul> </ul>
<h3>Unanimous Consent</h3> <h3>Without Objection</h3>
<ul> <ul>
<li>Any core member may get Unanimous Consent of core to do <li>Any core member may ask core, via email, if they can take
something.</li> some mundane action, subject to a quick sanity check of the
<li>This person shall send mail to core asking for unanimous rest of core.</li>
consent.</li> <li>If no one objects within 48 hours, then that person may proceed
<li>If no one objects within 48 hours, then core has approved it (or sooner if (2/3 * core-size) members agree).</li>
(or sooner if (2/3 * core-size) members say yes).</li>
<li>If there are any objections, then it will be resolved via the <li>If there are any objections, then it will be resolved via the
issue voting procedure.</li> issue voting procedure.</li>
<li>Core secretary may send the OK to proceed message, as the
secretary deems appropriate.</li>
</ul> </ul>
<p>Any committer may get unanimous consent of core to do something so <p>Any committer also use this mechanism so long as at least one
long as at least one core member says 'yes' and the previous paragraph core member says 'yes' and the previous paragraph is otherwise
is otherwise followed. followed. It is intended to be used for mundane matters that
<a href="http://www.senate.gov/legislative/common/briefing/Senate_legislative_process.htm"> need a quick sanity check, but don't need a more heavy weight
Unanimous Consent</a> is a specific term used by the US Senate and deliberative process. It is believed that the subset of
to mean 'without objection' and is used instead of a formal vote core present for any given 48 period are sufficient for both
for routine matters. sanity checking mundane matters and recognizing non-mundane
</p> matters that need to be handled via the issues voting
procedure.</p>
&footer; &footer;