From b007c6f3b8de45aa402efcb092482d9df0148810 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ceri Davies <ceri@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 12:02:58 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Add an XXX comment regarding account locking procedures. 
 This text is currently wrong, but the correct way to do this is currently
 pending a resolution in bin/71147.

---
 en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/security/chapter.sgml | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/security/chapter.sgml b/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/security/chapter.sgml
index 639124e0b0..afb1f9cd3c 100644
--- a/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/security/chapter.sgml
+++ b/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/security/chapter.sgml
@@ -373,6 +373,12 @@
 	the <groupname>wheel</groupname> mechanism is better than having
 	nothing at all, it is not necessarily the safest option.</para>
 
+      <!-- XXX:
+	This will need updating depending on the outcome of PR bin/71147.
+	Personally I know what I'd like to see, which puts this in definite
+	need of a rewrite, but we'll have to wait and see.  ceri@
+      -->
+
       <para>An indirect way to secure staff accounts, and ultimately
         <username>root</username> access is to use an alternative
 	login access method and