Correct format of the last few entries.

This commit is contained in:
Joseph Koshy 2001-02-13 07:02:09 +00:00
parent cf37f6d453
commit b3928bec1d
Notes: svn2git 2020-12-08 03:00:23 +00:00
svn path=/www/; revision=8782

View file

@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN" [
<!ENTITY base CDATA "..">
<!ENTITY date "$FreeBSD: www/en/news/press.sgml,v 1.169 2001/01/10 06:37:24 jkoshy Exp $">
<!ENTITY date "$FreeBSD: www/en/news/press.sgml,v 1.170 2001/02/06 05:40:45 jkoshy Exp $">
<!ENTITY title "FreeBSD in the Press">
<!ENTITY % includes SYSTEM "../includes.sgml"> %includes;
<!ENTITY % newsincludes SYSTEM "includes.sgml"> %newsincludes;
]>
<!-- $FreeBSD: www/en/news/press.sgml,v 1.169 2001/01/10 06:37:24 jkoshy Exp $ -->
<!-- $FreeBSD: www/en/news/press.sgml,v 1.170 2001/02/06 05:40:45 jkoshy Exp $ -->
<html>
&header;
@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
<a href="http://www.byte.com/column/BYT20010130S0010">
For Servers: Linux 2.4 vs. FreeBSD 4.1.1</a><br>
by Moshe Bar<br>
<p>BYTE's Linux guru finds himself wondering why he isn't running
BYTE's Linux guru finds himself wondering why he isn't running
FreeBSD --- a comparision (with informal benchmarks) of FreeBSD 4.1.1
and a Linux based distribution running the v2.4.0 Linux kernel.</p></li>
@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
<a href="http://www.webtechniques.com/archives/2001/01/infrrevu/">
Is FreeBSD a Superior Server Platform to Linux?</a><br>
by Nathan Boeger<br>
<p>A reviewer finds FreeBSD 4.1 to be better suited for web
A reviewer finds FreeBSD 4.1 to be better suited for web
serving than a Red Hat Linux distribution.</p></li>
<li><p><b><a href="http://www.ddj.com/">Dr Dobbs Journal</a>
@ -45,7 +45,7 @@
<a href="http://www.ddj.com/articles/2001/0165/0165a/0165a.htm">
A Roundtable on BSD, Security, and Quality</a><br>
by Jack J. Woehr<br>
<p>A report from a roundtable at the recent USENIX Security Symposium
A report from a roundtable at the recent USENIX Security Symposium
2000, involving several prominent developers in the BSD world.</p></li>
</ul>