Remove reference to WITHOUT_NLS which is deprecated in favor of the NLS option

Reviewed by:	rene, gavin
Approved by:	gavin
This commit is contained in:
Baptiste Daroussin 2013-07-29 19:27:07 +00:00
parent 799623b17f
commit b4a6c52a8f
Notes: svn2git 2020-12-08 03:00:23 +00:00
svn path=/head/; revision=42470

View file

@ -4302,13 +4302,6 @@ ${MANPREFIX}/man/de/man3/baz.3.gz</programlisting>
</thead> </thead>
<tbody> <tbody>
<row id="knobs-without-nls">
<entry><makevar>WITHOUT_NLS</makevar></entry>
<entry>If set, says that internationalization is not
needed, which can save compile time. By default,
internationalization is used.</entry>
</row>
<row> <row>
<entry><makevar>WITH_OPENSSL_BASE</makevar></entry> <entry><makevar>WITH_OPENSSL_BASE</makevar></entry>
<entry>Use the version of OpenSSL in the base <entry>Use the version of OpenSSL in the base
@ -4322,15 +4315,6 @@ ${MANPREFIX}/man/de/man3/baz.3.gz</programlisting>
role="package">security/openssl</filename>, even role="package">security/openssl</filename>, even
if the base is up to date.</entry> if the base is up to date.</entry>
</row> </row>
<row>
<entry><makevar>WITHOUT_X11</makevar></entry>
<entry>Ports that can be built both with and
without X support are normally
built with X support. If this variable is
defined, then the version that does not have X
support will be built instead.</entry>
</row>
</tbody> </tbody>
</tgroup> </tgroup>
</table> </table>
@ -5790,8 +5774,7 @@ GNU_CONFIGURE= yes</programlisting>
through passing <option>--disable-nls</option> to through passing <option>--disable-nls</option> to
<command>configure</command>. In that case, your port <command>configure</command>. In that case, your port
should use <literal>gettext</literal> conditionally, should use <literal>gettext</literal> conditionally,
depending on the status of <link depending on the status of the <makevar>NLS</makevar> option.
linkend="knobs-without-nls"><makevar>WITHOUT_NLS</makevar></link>.
For ports of low to medium complexity, you can rely on the For ports of low to medium complexity, you can rely on the
following idiom:</para> following idiom:</para>