- Separate entries with one <br>, not two;
- remove my workaround for the problem with xalf - for some reason it doesn't work and right not I do not have a time to debug what's going wrong; - add another entry: Why GNOME is so huge, slow and basically useless? - fix indentation in several places.
This commit is contained in:
parent
598f99c1ae
commit
ba71d3b5fd
Notes:
svn2git
2020-12-08 03:00:23 +00:00
svn path=/www/; revision=11728
1 changed files with 52 additions and 51 deletions
|
@ -19,11 +19,14 @@
|
|||
<li> <a href="#q3">I installed GNOME, but I'm missing application
|
||||
foo. What gives?</a>
|
||||
<li> <a href="#q4">What's the best way to upgrade GNOME?</a>
|
||||
<li> <a href="#q5">What is the difference between GNOME and KDE?
|
||||
<li> <a href="#q5">What is the difference between GNOME and KDE?
|
||||
Which one is better?</a>
|
||||
<li> <a href="#q6">Where can I get more themes for GNOME?</a>
|
||||
<li> <a href="#q7">What window managers work well with GNOME?</a>
|
||||
<li> <a href="#q8">Why can't I launch Linux apps from the GNOME panel?</a>
|
||||
<li> <a href="#q6">Where can I get more themes for GNOME?</a>
|
||||
<li> <a href="#q7">What window managers work well with GNOME?</a>
|
||||
<li> <a href="#q8">Why can't I launch Linux apps from the GNOME
|
||||
panel?</a>
|
||||
<li> <a href="#q9">Why GNOME is so huge, slow and basically
|
||||
useless?</a>
|
||||
</ol>
|
||||
<h2>Full Text </h2>
|
||||
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2">
|
||||
|
@ -85,10 +88,7 @@ WITH_GNOME=yes
|
|||
such as XMMS, to take advantage of the GNOME installation.</p>
|
||||
</td>
|
||||
</tr>
|
||||
<tr>
|
||||
<td width="10"><br></td>
|
||||
</tr>
|
||||
<tr><td colspan="4"><br></td></tr>
|
||||
<tr><td><br></td></tr>
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- Q2 -->
|
||||
<tr>
|
||||
|
@ -120,32 +120,29 @@ gnomecore
|
|||
|
||||
<p>Verify all those components are up-to-date, then try building
|
||||
GNOME or your GNOME application again. You may see compiler errors
|
||||
relating to pthreads (POSIX threads), such as:</p>
|
||||
relating to pthreads (POSIX threads), such as:</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<pre>
|
||||
<pre>
|
||||
undefined reference to 'strerror_r'
|
||||
</pre>
|
||||
</pre>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>To fix thread related errors, make sure you have the following
|
||||
compiled into your kernel:</p>
|
||||
<p>To fix thread related errors, make sure you have the following
|
||||
compiled into your kernel:</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<pre>
|
||||
<pre>
|
||||
options P1003_1B
|
||||
options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING
|
||||
</pre>
|
||||
</pre>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>And make sure if you're tracking -stable or -current, that you
|
||||
do <b>not</b> have <tt>NOLIBC_R</tt> set in <tt>/etc/make.conf</tt>.
|
||||
If you do, remove it, then rebuild world. If you still have trouble,
|
||||
please send email to <a href="mailto:&email;@FreeBSD.ORG">
|
||||
&email;@FreeBSD.ORG</a> with the output of the failed compilation.
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
<p>And make sure if you're tracking -stable or -current, that you
|
||||
do <b>not</b> have <tt>NOLIBC_R</tt> set in <tt>/etc/make.conf</tt>.
|
||||
If you do, remove it, then rebuild world. If you still have trouble,
|
||||
please send email to <a href="mailto:&email;@FreeBSD.ORG">
|
||||
&email;@FreeBSD.ORG</a> with the output of the failed compilation.
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
</td>
|
||||
</tr>
|
||||
<tr>
|
||||
<td width="10"><br></td>
|
||||
</tr>
|
||||
<tr><td colspan="4"><br></td></tr>
|
||||
<tr><td><br></td></tr>
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- Q3 -->
|
||||
<tr>
|
||||
|
@ -184,10 +181,7 @@ options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING
|
|||
FreeBSD can be found <a href="../../ports/gnome.html">here</a>.</p>
|
||||
</td>
|
||||
</tr>
|
||||
<tr>
|
||||
<td width="10"><br></td>
|
||||
</tr>
|
||||
<tr><td colspan="4"><br></td></tr>
|
||||
<tr><td><br></td></tr>
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- Q4 -->
|
||||
<tr>
|
||||
|
@ -221,10 +215,7 @@ options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING
|
|||
</pre>
|
||||
</td>
|
||||
</tr>
|
||||
<tr>
|
||||
<td width="10"><br></td>
|
||||
</tr>
|
||||
<tr><td colspan="4"><br></td></tr>
|
||||
<tr><td><br></td></tr>
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- Q5 -->
|
||||
<tr>
|
||||
|
@ -248,16 +239,13 @@ options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING
|
|||
games to full-blown office suites. Both are actively developed and
|
||||
ported to FreeBSD. If you're trying to decide which one to call
|
||||
your own, try them both, and see which one <b>you</b> like better.
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
</p>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>You can read more about KDE on FreeBSD at
|
||||
<a href="http://freebsd.kde.org">http://freebsd.kde.org</a>.</p>
|
||||
</td>
|
||||
</tr>
|
||||
<tr>
|
||||
<td width="10"><br></td>
|
||||
</tr>
|
||||
<tr><td colspan="4"><br></td></tr>
|
||||
<tr><td><br></td></tr>
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- Q6 -->
|
||||
<tr>
|
||||
|
@ -292,10 +280,7 @@ options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING
|
|||
before using any of the pixmap themes from themes.org.</p>
|
||||
</td>
|
||||
</tr>
|
||||
<tr>
|
||||
<td width="10"><br></td>
|
||||
</tr>
|
||||
<tr><td colspan="4"><br></td></tr>
|
||||
<tr><td><br></td></tr>
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- Q7 -->
|
||||
<tr>
|
||||
|
@ -323,10 +308,7 @@ options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING
|
|||
</ul>
|
||||
</td>
|
||||
</tr>
|
||||
<tr>
|
||||
<td width="10"><br></td>
|
||||
</tr>
|
||||
<tr><td colspan="4"><br></td></tr>
|
||||
<tr><td><br></td></tr>
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- Q8 -->
|
||||
<tr>
|
||||
|
@ -351,20 +333,39 @@ options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING
|
|||
/usr/local/Acrobat4/Reader/intellinux/bin/acroread: error in loading shared
|
||||
libraries: /usr/X11R6/lib/libxalflaunch.so.0: ELF file OS ABI invalid.
|
||||
</pre>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
<p>To workaround this problem you need to disable Launch Feedback.
|
||||
To do this, open up the GNOME Control Center, and select
|
||||
Desktop->Launch Feedback. Uncheck all the options. Click OK.
|
||||
You should now be able to launch your Linux apps from the GNOME
|
||||
panel. Another option is to install Linux version of xalf into
|
||||
<tt>/compat/linux/usr/X11R6/lib/libxalflaunch.so.0</tt> - in
|
||||
this case Linux emulator will pick up Linux version of the shared
|
||||
object instead when it's being loaded from a Linux binary.</p>
|
||||
panel.</p>
|
||||
</td>
|
||||
</tr>
|
||||
<tr><td><br></td></tr>
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- Q9 -->
|
||||
<tr>
|
||||
<td width="10">
|
||||
<font><a name="q9"> 9.</a></font></td>
|
||||
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="3">
|
||||
<b>Why GNOME is so huge, slow and basically useless?</b>
|
||||
</td>
|
||||
</tr>
|
||||
<!-- A9 -->
|
||||
<tr>
|
||||
<td width="10"><br></td>
|
||||
<td align="left" valign="top" colspan="3">
|
||||
<p>Well, it depends on the point of view. Of course both GNOME
|
||||
and KDE are still far from perfection or even completeness and
|
||||
hardly could be compared to commercial offerings in terms of
|
||||
user-friendlity, but at the same time it is a huge step in the
|
||||
right direction. It also should be noted, that both GNOME and
|
||||
KDE are still very young and situation is likely to improve as
|
||||
they will mature (does anybody remember what sort of crap
|
||||
Windows 3.11 was?).</p>
|
||||
</td>
|
||||
</tr>
|
||||
<tr><td><br></td></tr>
|
||||
|
||||
</table>
|
||||
</td>
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue