From c776c09754eef267db33ce4cbb1da8f61811a3b2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Brad Davis Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:00:00 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Correct some typos in the links. PR: 140724 --- en/marketing/os-comparison.sgml | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/en/marketing/os-comparison.sgml b/en/marketing/os-comparison.sgml index 69c45d2a09..d54e0dc55d 100644 --- a/en/marketing/os-comparison.sgml +++ b/en/marketing/os-comparison.sgml @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ - + @@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ href="#3">3.

performance and consistency differences between journaled and soft updates consistency mechanisms. This paper is available online from http://www.ece.cmu.edu/~gnager/papers/usenix2000.ps. + href="http://www.ece.cmu.edu/~ganger/papers/usenix2000.ps">http://www.ece.cmu.edu/~ganger/papers/usenix2000.ps. This paper also discusses two different journaling implementations based on FFS and developed on FreeBSD. Clearly, FreeBSD is at the forefront of filesystem research and this is the source of many of @@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ href="#3">3.

"Soft Updates: A Technique for Eliminating Most Synchronous Writes in the Fast Filesystem" by Marshall Kirk McKusick and Gregory R. Ganger.
http://www.ece.cmu.edu/~gnager/papers/mckusick99.ps.

+ href="http://www.ece.cmu.edu/~ganger/papers/mckusick99.ps">http://www.ece.cmu.edu/~ganger/papers/mckusick99.ps.

Performance Benchmarks