Remove references to the TRB as it is being dissolved due to lack of

activity.

Approved by:	core
This commit is contained in:
John Baldwin 2005-08-16 18:53:16 +00:00
parent 4277a936c1
commit c809dac552
Notes: svn2git 2020-12-08 03:00:23 +00:00
svn path=/www/; revision=25385
3 changed files with 2 additions and 58 deletions

View file

@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ allows multiple documents to use the abbreviated entities, and allows
us to update author names, or the representation of those names (such
as adding email addresses), by just editing a single file.
$FreeBSD: www/en/developers.sgml,v 1.101 2005/07/16 13:48:59 remko Exp $
$FreeBSD: www/en/developers.sgml,v 1.102 2005/08/11 05:17:03 linimon Exp $
-->
@ -193,6 +193,3 @@ so that we may keep a list of hat owners and modify only this file. -->
<!ENTITY a.so '&a.nectar;'>
<!ENTITY a.so-team '&a.csjp;, &a.remko;, &a.simon;, &a.cperciva;, &a.trhodes;, &a.des;, &a.guido;, &a.nectar;, &a.rwatson;'>
<!-- FreeBSD Technical Review Board -->
<!ENTITY a.trb '&a.dfr;, &a.jake;, &a.jeff;, &a.iedowse;, &a.alc;, &a.gallatin;, &a.jhb;, &a.peter;, &a.imp;, &a.sam;'>

View file

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
# $FreeBSD: www/en/internal/Makefile,v 1.41 2005/01/28 16:52:17 imp Exp $
# $FreeBSD: www/en/internal/Makefile,v 1.42 2005/03/12 07:37:56 linimon Exp $
.if exists(../Makefile.conf)
.include "../Makefile.conf"
@ -19,7 +19,6 @@ DOCS+= bylaws.sgml
DOCS+= releng.sgml
DOCS+= expire-bits.sgml
DOCS+= core-vote.sgml
DOCS+= trb-dispute.sgml
DOCS+= doceng.sgml
DOCS+= rtp.sgml
DOCS+= policies.sgml

View file

@ -1,52 +0,0 @@
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" [
<!ENTITY base CDATA "..">
<!ENTITY date "$FreeBSD: www/en/internal/trb-dispute.sgml,v 1.2 2003/07/23 16:25:27 simon Exp $">
<!ENTITY title "TRB Dispute Resolution charter">
<!ENTITY % includes SYSTEM "../includes.sgml"> %includes;
]>
<html>
&header;
<p>This document outlines the procedure that the Technical Review Board (TRB)
follows when resolving disagreements of a technical nature. This document
does not describe the whole of the TRB responsibilities and procedures.
If at any time during the resolution of the conflict the two parties come
to a mutual agreement the TRB arbitration process will end.</p>
<p>A technical dispute is brought to the TRB. This may happen at the
request of a participant in a deadlocked dispute. It may also happen
if it becomes clear to a member of the TRB or core that the disputing
parties are not able to resolve the issue in a timely or professional
manner.</p>
<p>The TRB will announce on arch@ that it is considering an issue. A
request is made for all interested parties to submit one email
stating their position on this issue to the trb@ mailing list. These
emails are available to all committers via the trb archive.</p>
<p>The TRB makes requests of those who have submitted their opinions on
the subject to clarify points. This discussion will continue on the
trb@ list. If possible the TRB will steer the involved parties
towards resolving the issue themselves.</p>
<p>A member of the TRB produces a brief document describing the core
technical issues and a summary of the opinions of either side. If
the involved parties can not come to a conclusion themselves the
TRB will decide on a best plan of action based on the facts
presented.</p>
<p>A vote is held on trb-private@. This is done privately to mitigate
any impressions of bias either way from individual members of TRB.
If a member of TRB has some non technical interest in the vote they
are required to abstain from voting.</p>
<p>The results of the private vote are announced on arch@ and trb@.
This will include a short statement detailing the position of the
TRB on this issue and the number of votes for each option. The
decision will be based on a majority vote. The results are
considered final and all appeals must go through core@.</p>
&footer;
</body>
</html>