From cc2d502eedd2f2f391cb20dd5aec1eaede216c07 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Simon L. B. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 22:56:20 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Make it more clear when to use the "Traditional" way of
 building a kernel.

Submitted by:		keramida
Inaccuracy reported by:	Terry L. Tyson Jr. <ty@tyson.homeunix.org>
---
 en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig/chapter.sgml | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig/chapter.sgml b/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig/chapter.sgml
index 1fdf550fce..75a9816806 100644
--- a/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig/chapter.sgml
+++ b/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig/chapter.sgml
@@ -358,9 +358,11 @@
     </indexterm>
 
     <para>If you have <emphasis>not</emphasis> upgraded your source
-      tree in any way (you have not run <application>CVSup</application>, 
+      tree in any way since the last time you successfully completed
+      a <maketarget>buildworld</maketarget>-<maketarget>installworld</maketarget> cycle
+      (you have not run <application>CVSup</application>,
       <application>CTM</application>, or used 
-      <application>anoncvs</application>), then you should use the 
+      <application>anoncvs</application>), then it is safe to use the
       <command>config</command>, <maketarget>make depend</maketarget>,
       <command>make</command>, <maketarget>make install</maketarget> sequence.
     </para>