Add English language transcripts to 7 of the videos currently from the

'BSD Conferences' YouTube channel.

In addition to the obvious benefits to the hearing impaired, these
files are being checked in here to :

1. Enable additional human editing of the technical content to improve
   the transcriptions.

2. Enable the translation teams to more easily track changes and make
   translated closed captions of the videos.

3. Provide a centralized source for audio/video transcripts separate
   from the particular YouTube hosting solution that is currently
   used.

4. Improve the access to this content for search engines and web users.

Transcripts made with the help of YouTube Machine Translation and then
human editors hired through Amazon Mechanical Turk to improve the
transcriptions further.

Sponsored by:  FreeBSD Foundation
This commit is contained in:
Murray Stokely 2010-01-30 21:45:08 +00:00
parent c339446818
commit cf5068ab40
Notes: svn2git 2020-12-08 03:00:23 +00:00
svn path=/head/; revision=35279
8 changed files with 18742 additions and 0 deletions

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load diff

View file

@ -0,0 +1,932 @@
0:00:02.199,0:00:08.939
I
0:00:08.939,0:00:11.849
they said
0:00:11.849,0:00:14.669
welcome everybody welcome to BSD v. GPL
0:00:14.669,0:00:19.259
personaly i'd like to thank the organizers
and the volunteers for making the New York City BSDCon
0:00:19.259,0:00:20.609
possible
0:00:20.609,0:00:23.579
and my employer OmniTI
0:00:23.579,0:00:24.830
for sponsoring my talk
0:00:24.830,0:00:26.789
I had to get that in
0:00:26.789,0:00:29.169
a couple years ago I was invited to give a talk here
0:00:29.169,0:00:33.990
that was quite quite a lot of fun to give and seemed
be well received
0:00:33.990,0:00:37.110
fortunately they were fool hardy enough to invite me
back again
0:00:37.110,0:00:42.460
but as we know sequels really measure up so
the official title of this is
0:00:42.460,0:00:44.890
not the sequel to "BSD is Dying"
0:00:44.890,0:00:51.790
but don't worry it's just as short as the first one
0:00:51.790,0:00:54.530
BSD v. GSL the great debate
0:00:54.530,0:00:57.990
the ongoing conflict between users of the BSD
0:00:57.990,0:01:00.880
and GPL licenses
0:01:00.880,0:01:02.290
well what is the debate
0:01:02.290,0:01:03.430
do you mean like
0:01:03.430,0:01:04.799
gosh Jason
0:01:04.799,0:01:07.000
I didn't know there was a debate between
0:01:07.000,0:01:10.990
the BSD and GPL licenses
0:01:10.990,0:01:13.130
or like duh Jason
0:01:13.130,0:01:14.220
everyone knows that
0:01:14.220,0:01:15.869
BSD has already won
0:01:20.220,0:01:22.360
well for the sake of argument
0:01:22.360,0:01:25.250
let's assume that we're talking about the former
0:01:25.250,0:01:27.480
so back to the debate
0:01:27.480,0:01:30.680
which license is more free
0:01:30.680,0:01:33.430
it depends a lot on how you define freedom
0:01:33.430,0:01:37.000
is it a tool used to guarantee the freedom of the code
0:01:37.000,0:01:38.560
for everyone
0:01:38.560,0:01:39.900
or is it a mechanism
0:01:39.900,0:01:42.620
providing select freedoms
0:01:42.620,0:01:49.620
to a select group of users
0:01:52.420,0:01:56.980
I'll let you make that judgment for yourselfs
0:01:56.980,0:01:59.540
but first let's step back in time a moment
0:01:59.540,0:02:01.570
look at the origins of the BSD
0:02:01.570,0:02:03.440
and GPL licenses
0:02:03.440,0:02:10.440
which should help us better understand their
goals and philosophies
0:02:12.420,0:02:15.079
I know boo
0:02:15.079,0:02:20.049
even though work on the ancestors of UNIX
dates back to nineteen seventy four
0:02:20.049,0:02:25.069
it took roughly fifteen years to get to
a point where these licenses became a necessity
0:02:25.069,0:02:26.959
back in nineteen eighty five
0:02:26.959,0:02:28.299
Richard Stallman
0:02:28.299,0:02:30.909
a member of the staff at MIT
0:02:30.909,0:02:31.840
had a dispute
0:02:31.840,0:02:34.769
with the company named UniPress
0:02:34.769,0:02:37.419
another developer named James Gosling
0:02:37.419,0:02:42.699
developed the first version of Emacs written in C
0:02:43.759,0:02:48.809
after Stallman had incorporated parts Goslings Emacs
into Gnu Emacs
0:02:48.809,0:02:53.079
Gosling sold the rights to UniPress
0:02:53.079,0:02:55.719
UniPress theatened Stallman
0:02:55.719,0:02:58.569
against further redistribution of the Gosling bits
0:02:58.569,0:03:01.169
so he rewote the effected portions
0:03:01.169,0:03:04.819
and released a new version under a copyleft license
0:03:04.819,0:03:08.449
call Emacs General Public License
0:03:08.449,0:03:10.220
the June nineteen eighty eight issue
0:03:10.220,0:03:12.159
of the GNU bulletion
0:03:12.159,0:03:15.669
first mentioned that GNU general public
license
0:03:15.669,0:03:18.449
but even his earlest announcement foreshadowed
0:03:18.449,0:03:25.449
an underlying theme that forms the great debate
0:03:27.009,0:03:29.599
switching gears
0:03:29.599,0:03:31.449
switching gears we find ourselves
0:03:31.449,0:03:33.609
in the summer of 1989
0:03:33.609,0:03:36.010
soaking up the summer rays in the computer
lab
0:03:36.010,0:03:38.889
of CSRG of Cal Berkeley
0:03:38.889,0:03:41.019
the Berkeley Software Distribution
0:03:41.019,0:03:44.859
already had thousands of copies distributed to
users
0:03:44.859,0:03:46.769
because the releases included the source code
0:03:46.769,0:03:48.519
AT&T Unix
0:03:48.519,0:03:50.799
as well as Berkeley's improvements
0:03:50.799,0:03:52.480
users were required to purchase
0:03:52.480,0:03:55.619
an AT&T source license
0:03:55.619,0:03:57.079
demand had built up
0:03:57.079,0:03:59.139
for a version of BSD Unix
0:03:59.139,0:04:02.650
that didn't require an AT&T source license
0:04:02.650,0:04:05.269
so BSD developers were able to put together a
release
0:04:05.269,0:04:07.039
free of AT&T code
0:04:07.039,0:04:10.609
that included the BSD originated TCP/IP networking
0:04:10.609,0:04:13.979
stack and it's supported utilities
0:04:13.979,0:04:18.339
this version was officially known as Networking Release 1
or NET/1
0:04:18.339,0:04:20.359
and was released under a liberal license
0:04:20.359,0:04:22.839
were the user could redistribute the code
0:04:22.839,0:04:24.189
modified or unmodified
0:04:24.189,0:04:26.449
source or binary form
0:04:26.449,0:04:30.169
with no accounting of roylaties to Berkeley
0:04:30.169,0:04:32.069
even with these liberal terms
0:04:32.069,0:04:35.470
hundreds of organizations step forward to paid
the one thousand dollar fee
0:04:35.470,0:04:41.590
for copies of the official NET/1 media
0:04:41.590,0:04:45.989
by 1991 the free software community had
considerable momentum
0:04:45.989,0:04:48.239
with the success of the GNU
0:04:48.239,0:04:50.709
compiler collection of userland tools
0:04:50.709,0:04:53.059
berkeley's own networking release 2
0:04:53.059,0:04:56.180
GPLv2 and the LGPL
0:04:56.180,0:04:58.419
and the linux kernel
0:04:59.639,0:05:02.130
a fledgling knockoff of MINIX
0:05:02.130,0:05:03.400
created by a student
0:05:03.400,0:05:08.219
at the University of Helsinki
0:05:08.219,0:05:12.879
come 1992 the BSD community
was buckling up for a wild right
0:05:12.879,0:05:15.080
Unix Systems Laboratories
0:05:15.080,0:05:17.709
a subsidiary of AT&T
0:05:17.709,0:05:20.050
filed suit against BSDI
0:05:20.050,0:05:22.840
claiming that their derivative of Berkeley's NET/2
0:05:22.840,0:05:25.919
infringed on the official the AT&T copyrights
0:05:25.919,0:05:27.460
by 1994
0:05:27.460,0:05:28.920
the lawsuit was settled
0:05:28.920,0:05:32.520
largely in favor of BSDI and Cal Berkeley
0:05:32.520,0:05:38.819
but the impact of BSD adoption was
substantial
0:05:38.819,0:05:41.149
hello
0:05:41.149,0:05:45.660
new users gravitated to the Linux and
GNU alternative in droves
0:05:45.660,0:05:48.469
resulting in increased acceptance
0:05:48.469,0:05:54.490
of Stallman's GPL license and new manifesto
0:05:54.490,0:05:57.910
with a little bit of history under our belt
we can begin to take a deeper look at the
0:05:57.910,0:05:59.180
goals of each license
0:05:59.180,0:06:02.479
and the means it uses
0:06:02.479,0:06:06.699
and I means it uses to reach those ends
0:06:06.699,0:06:09.909
certainly these two licenses share
some common goals
0:06:09.909,0:06:12.250
they're both OSI approved licenses
0:06:12.250,0:06:13.310
suitable
0:06:13.310,0:06:16.870
for a variety of software projects
0:06:16.870,0:06:20.459
both licenses require attribution to remain intact
0:06:20.459,0:06:23.770
typically in the form of a copyright notice
within the license
0:06:23.770,0:06:27.560
every developer reserves the right to point
a completed works and take credit for their
0:06:27.560,0:06:29.509
efforts
0:06:29.509,0:06:33.529
admittedly some may choose not too
0:06:33.529,0:06:37.439
we don't have any MySQL developers in here do we
0:06:37.439,0:06:41.729
both licenses
0:06:41.729,0:06:43.999
but licenses convey freedoms to the user
0:06:43.999,0:06:47.399
to use the code as he or she sees fit
0:06:47.399,0:06:50.059
to read and learn from the code
0:06:50.059,0:06:52.059
use the resulting binaries
0:06:52.059,0:06:54.470
to develop your own applications
0:06:54.470,0:06:59.960
and stick it to your favorite three letter agencies
0:06:59.960,0:07:02.619
both licenses allow users
0:07:02.619,0:07:04.500
to redistribute
0:07:04.500,0:07:06.979
source code in binary forms
0:07:06.979,0:07:08.930
provided certain conditions are met
0:07:08.930,0:07:11.949
we'll come back to this in a few moments
0:07:11.949,0:07:14.969
both licenses provide some basic disclaimers
0:07:14.969,0:07:17.699
as a layer of protection for the developer
0:07:17.699,0:07:21.159
against claims of liability
0:07:21.159,0:07:22.949
for any direct
0:07:22.949,0:07:24.539
indirect
0:07:24.539,0:07:26.550
incidental
0:07:26.550,0:07:27.999
exemplary
0:07:27.999,0:07:30.659
thats a really hard one to get a picture of
0:07:30.659,0:07:37.289
or consequential damages
0:07:37.289,0:07:39.070
including but not limited to
0:07:39.070,0:07:46.070
procurement of substitute goods and services
0:07:46.939,0:07:48.060
loss of use,
0:07:55.789,0:08:02.789
loss of data,
0:08:04.990,0:08:09.710
lost profits,
0:08:09.710,0:08:16.710
or business interuption
0:08:17.119,0:08:20.519
I'd like to say that I did this slide before this
week
0:08:20.519,0:08:24.449
anyone who knows me knows that's not true
0:08:24.449,0:08:28.599
as we've seen both BSD and GPL licences share
some common freedoms
0:08:28.599,0:08:31.839
but as we know the devil's in the details
0:08:31.839,0:08:35.600
I'd actually like to ask for audience participation
in the following slides
0:08:35.600,0:08:36.719
this is my own experiment
0:08:36.719,0:08:41.110
to help gadge the communities familiarity with
the licenses
0:08:41.110,0:08:42.870
I'm going to read off a phrase
0:08:42.870,0:08:45.990
and I'd like you all to tell me which license
it is applicable too
0:08:45.990,0:08:49.120
k lets begin
0:08:49.120,0:08:50.029
freedom for everyone
0:08:50.029,0:08:51.619
even businesses
0:08:51.619,0:08:54.810
BSD
0:08:54.810,0:08:57.060
anti-capitalist socialism
0:08:57.060,0:09:00.560
GPL
0:09:00.560,0:09:02.210
thank you
0:09:02.210,0:09:04.540
that's correct
0:09:04.540,0:09:08.190
easy compliance
0:09:08.190,0:09:09.529
force code
0:09:09.529,0:09:10.700
to remain open
0:09:10.700,0:09:13.190
GDL
0:09:13.190,0:09:15.230
world domination
0:09:15.230,0:09:18.180
BSD
0:09:18.180,0:09:19.690
perhaps FreeBSD
0:09:22.080,0:09:25.420
I'll give you half credit
0:09:25.420,0:09:29.960
shut up and hack
0:09:29.960,0:09:31.220
brief and simple
0:09:31.220,0:09:33.620
BSD
0:09:33.620,0:09:40.190
complex and obtuse
0:09:44.390,0:09:48.800
this is not the ASB graph this is
something someone pointed to online
0:09:48.800,0:09:55.800
it represents the word count in each
version of the BSD and GPL licenses
0:10:00.030,0:10:01.790
yes and I think that that's true
0:10:01.790,0:10:06.270
the the for and third up losses
0:10:06.270,0:10:11.340
it was over the issue it before
0:10:11.340,0:10:15.120
take that as you will
0:10:15.120,0:10:17.080
and I mentioned previously that both include
0:10:17.080,0:10:19.260
some conditions regarding distribution
0:10:19.260,0:10:23.370
this in particular is where you see a real diversion
philosophies
0:10:23.370,0:10:26.439
the GPL license includes a number of
terms and conditions
0:10:26.439,0:10:28.880
intent on restricting the sale, use
0:10:28.880,0:10:31.130
and redistribution of the effect it works
0:10:31.130,0:10:34.190
let's look at the examples
0:10:34.190,0:10:34.689
first
0:10:34.689,0:10:37.610
your aloowed to copy and distribute the program source code
0:10:37.610,0:10:39.090
so long as you include
0:10:39.090,0:10:40.920
the copyright notice
0:10:40.920,0:10:43.040
the disclaimer of warrenty
0:10:43.040,0:10:46.460
and any notices that refer to the license
0:10:46.460,0:10:52.230
I wasn't sure that anybody would get this
0:10:52.230,0:10:55.840
you may also charge a fee for packaging or
0:10:55.840,0:10:57.690
transferal of the work
0:10:57.690,0:11:02.750
or offer warrenty protection for a fee
0:11:02.750,0:11:07.330
but you may not sell the software
0:11:07.330,0:11:10.279
you can copy or distribute any derivative works
0:11:10.279,0:11:13.010
providing you meet the following conditions
0:11:13.010,0:11:17.860
any modified files most prominently displayed
notice that the files were changed
0:11:17.860,0:11:23.160
it must be a license as a whole and no charge
to any thrid parties
0:11:23.160,0:11:26.740
and if the program reads commands interactivly when run
0:11:26.740,0:11:28.800
it must display an announcement
0:11:28.800,0:11:35.800
including a copyright notice and disclaimer
of warrenty
0:11:37.570,0:11:40.860
you may copy or distribute the code in binary form
0:11:40.860,0:11:43.140
provided you meet these conditions
0:11:43.140,0:11:46.190
you include the corresponding source code
0:11:46.190,0:11:49.860
a written offer
0:11:49.860,0:11:52.380
valid for at least three years
0:11:52.380,0:11:57.720
to provide any third party with a copy of the
source code
0:11:57.720,0:12:04.720
for a fee not to exceed the cost of distributing the source code
0:12:06.120,0:12:09.690
there are other restrictions as well we have covered
the most intrusive ones
0:12:09.690,0:12:16.690
the other is a mass of while the religious
right
0:12:17.680,0:12:21.500
to be fair the FCC licenses and without its
own restrictions
0:12:21.500,0:12:26.620
most of the issue mainstream the is the distributions
such as previously majesty
0:12:26.620,0:12:31.950
and ratified is the up for further to cosby
is the lessons for nafta
0:12:31.950,0:12:34.420
the only issue brought it goes one step further
0:12:34.420,0:12:38.600
using the issue like a modified highest the
license with no extra cost
0:12:38.600,0:12:42.980
but again even these have a number of his
first reactions use our freedoms
0:12:42.980,0:12:44.500
here's an exhaustive lives
0:12:44.500,0:12:51.500
of these restrictions
0:12:52.270,0:12:58.040
activists loyal there
0:12:58.040,0:13:02.640
no more free license is the easier it is to
comply
0:13:02.640,0:13:05.190
conversely the more complex a license becomes
0:13:05.190,0:13:10.240
the more likely it is that violations her
0:13:10.240,0:13:13.250
the saw for freedom law center
0:13:13.250,0:13:20.150
offers legal representation
0:13:20.150,0:13:23.220
the free and open source offer projects
0:13:23.220,0:13:28.590
the web site lead you to believe that they
defend the rights of all streets are process
0:13:28.590,0:13:30.830
but would review the press releases
0:13:30.830,0:13:35.560
shows that every single case it's a has been
released
0:13:35.560,0:13:38.040
in fact many of you may remember last year
0:13:38.040,0:13:41.570
when will it makes their story developers
0:13:41.570,0:13:43.519
realizing straight floaters
0:13:43.519,0:13:46.840
obviously if they're struggling the jeep you
know
0:13:46.840,0:13:48.250
what you saw
0:13:48.250,0:13:52.860
what they also removed rates copyright points
that the case
0:13:52.860,0:13:55.020
the software freedom also stepped in
0:13:55.020,0:13:58.570
in convince limits developers to correct the
rich states
0:13:58.570,0:14:02.570
but not until a storm of controversy was unleashed
0:14:02.570,0:14:06.700
causing hardship among the lyrics and the
it's the communities
0:14:06.700,0:14:10.170
the press releases carefully worded
0:14:10.170,0:14:14.980
to make it safe
0:14:14.980,0:14:16.749
to make it sound like they were betting
0:14:16.749,0:14:20.360
you can be as the license for compatibility
0:14:20.360,0:14:25.420
rather than explaining how the limits developers
infringed on race right
0:14:25.420,0:14:31.830
does anyone else in also
0:14:31.830,0:14:35.030
because copyright a softer also complex
0:14:35.030,0:14:38.830
the number of missus claus up we're going
to be as easy going as this is
0:14:38.830,0:14:40.640
i'd like to conclude my top
0:14:40.640,0:14:43.740
but they're not few days
0:14:43.740,0:14:45.010
this is number one
0:14:45.010,0:14:47.390
did you get a license is more free
0:14:47.390,0:14:49.610
although places restrictions on users
0:14:49.610,0:14:51.540
the integrity of freedom
0:14:51.540,0:14:54.420
possibly forcing uses to publish their changes
0:14:54.420,0:14:59.390
results in a greater level of freedom
0:14:59.390,0:15:01.880
the restrictions always means less free
0:15:01.880,0:15:03.579
what did the original developer
0:15:03.579,0:15:04.620
born in danger
0:15:04.620,0:15:08.710
did you kill always places additional restrictions
on the economy
0:15:08.710,0:15:09.910
modification
0:15:09.910,0:15:12.950
redistribution effect it works
0:15:12.950,0:15:14.520
that number two
0:15:14.520,0:15:16.830
the issue through to be still
0:15:16.830,0:15:20.350
he also claim that because the company can
take care
0:15:20.350,0:15:22.110
make the changes proprietary
0:15:22.110,0:15:23.439
that somehow lessons
0:15:23.439,0:15:29.000
the freemen's of the original up
0:15:29.000,0:15:31.450
this is completed on a ship
0:15:31.450,0:15:35.060
the result was always this tree is a ritual
developers she said
0:15:35.060,0:15:41.130
no evil corporation to subvert the rights
of other users to the the issue is
0:15:41.130,0:15:42.600
number three
0:15:42.600,0:15:45.060
so Richard Stallman is a socialist
0:15:45.060,0:15:48.670
intent on destroying commercial software companies
0:15:48.670,0:15:49.830
yes
0:15:49.830,0:15:53.780
I
0:15:53.780,0:15:56.310
Richard Stallman actually congress
0:15:56.310,0:16:00.380
intent on destroying commercial software companies
0:16:00.380,0:16:03.920
socialism actually from a state ownership
it means of production
0:16:03.920,0:16:05.090
rather
0:16:05.090,0:16:07.870
Stallman believes in the class of state fourteen
days of all the rules

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load diff

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load diff

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load diff

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load diff

View file

@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
$FreeBSD$
This directory holds closed captions for audio and video recordings of
technical presentations about FreeBSD.
The expected hierarchy is :
doc/${LANG}/captions/${YEAR}/${CONFERENCE}/${TALK}
e.g.
doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/captions/2009/asiabsdcon/mckusick-kernelinternals.sbv
Individual captions are currently stored as YouTube 'sbv' files which
are simple ASCII text files with timing and transcription information.