Tried to harden up the language about NOT including the package name (or
software version) in pkg/COMMENT. Implicitly requested by: Satoshi
This commit is contained in:
parent
979d2169b5
commit
d5428b8e7e
Notes:
svn2git
2020-12-08 03:00:23 +00:00
svn path=/head/; revision=828
1 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions
|
|
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
|||
<!-- $Id: porting.sgml,v 1.48 1996-12-09 08:47:03 obrien Exp $ -->
|
||||
<!-- $Id: porting.sgml,v 1.49 1996-12-18 00:10:02 obrien Exp $ -->
|
||||
<!-- The FreeBSD Documentation Project -->
|
||||
|
||||
<sect1><heading>Porting an existing piece of free software<label id="porting"></heading>
|
||||
|
|
@ -191,10 +191,10 @@ The pattern is the year followed by the month.
|
|||
<sect4>
|
||||
<heading>COMMENT</heading>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>This is the one-line description of the port. It is
|
||||
recommended to <em>not</em> have the name of the package
|
||||
at the beginning, or the version number of the software at
|
||||
the end. Here is an example:
|
||||
<p>This is the one-line description of the port. <em>PLEASE
|
||||
do not include the package name (or version number of the
|
||||
software) in the comment.</em>
|
||||
Here is an example:
|
||||
<tscreen><verb>
|
||||
A cat chasing a mouse all over the screen.
|
||||
</verb></tscreen>
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue