From de0b386e27d8170258295105f9909eae36c9ce52 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Warren Block Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 23:27:24 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Update the Core report based on feedback. --- .../news/status/report-2015-04-2015-06.xml | 20 ++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/news/status/report-2015-04-2015-06.xml b/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/news/status/report-2015-04-2015-06.xml index fdf95d0b9b..bfa1fd747d 100644 --- a/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/news/status/report-2015-04-2015-06.xml +++ b/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/news/status/report-2015-04-2015-06.xml @@ -906,18 +906,14 @@ fairly radical ideas under discussion about how to improve the project's responsiveness to security issues.

-

Shortly after BSDCan in mid-June, Warner Losh proposed a - change to style(9) which resulted in some lively - discussion. An informal poll was conducted via Phabricator - and the change was committed within a couple of days. - Unfortunately, this did not meet with universal approval and - Core was called upon to arbitrate. Warner backed out the - change, recognizing that there had not been enough time - allowed for proper discussion. Many people were still in - transit from BSDCan, and the voting arrangements did not suit - everyone. A new poll has since been held, with votes either - by e-mail or the Slowvote facility of Phabricator. This - resulted in approval of the change by a wide margin.

+

In mid-June, a change to style(9) was proposed, and + resulted in much lively discussion. Warner Losh conducted an + informal poll with Phabricator and the change was approved and + committed within a couple of days. Unfortunately, complaints + were raised about the timing and voting methods and Core was + called upon to arbitrate. The change was backed out + voluntarily, a new poll was held with more time to vote, and + the change was approved.

During this period we had two new commit bits awarded, and one taken in for safekeeping. Welcome aboard to Chris Torek