os/doc
3
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Mention that the private folder is also not using ACLs.

Browse source 
In the UFS ACLs chapter, there is an example showing ACL-enabled
filesystems using a + sign. However, there is a directory private lited
there that is not having ACLs enabled, but it is not mentioned in the
text below the example. Add it there to avoid confusion.

PR:		251528
Submitted by:	panden@gmail.com
This commit is contained in:
Benedict Reuschling 2020-12-20 12:09:22 +00:00
parent 28dade007b
commit e6f974e9ea
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions

4
en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/security/chapter.xml
View file

@ -3096,8 +3096,8 @@ drwxr-xr-x 2 robert robert 512 Nov 10 11:54 public_html</programlisting>
<para>In this example, <filename>directory1</filename>,
<filename>directory2</filename>, and
<filename>directory3</filename> are all taking advantage of
<acronym>ACL</acronym>s, whereas
<filename>public_html</filename> is not.</para>
<acronym>ACL</acronym>s, whereas <filename>private</filename>
and <filename>public_html</filename> are not.</para>
</sect2>
<sect2>