Don't compare swap usage to Linux: it isn't known if this comparison is
still true. Expand a bit on what &os; might do with the extra memory. Approved by: bcr (mentor)
This commit is contained in:
parent
5c4e36738c
commit
e8b50cb82d
Notes:
svn2git
2020-12-08 03:00:23 +00:00
svn path=/head/; revision=40595
1 changed files with 5 additions and 7 deletions
|
|
@ -7960,18 +7960,16 @@ hint.sio.7.irq="12"</programlisting>
|
|||
<qandaset>
|
||||
<qandaentry>
|
||||
<question id="more-swap">
|
||||
<para>&os; uses far more swap space than &linux;. Why?</para>
|
||||
<para>&os; a lot of swap space even when the computer has
|
||||
free memory left. Why?</para>
|
||||
</question>
|
||||
|
||||
<answer>
|
||||
<para>&os; only appears to use more swap than &linux;. In
|
||||
actual fact, it does not. The main difference between &os;
|
||||
and &linux; in this regard is that &os; will proactively
|
||||
<para>&os; will proactively
|
||||
move entirely idle, unused pages of main memory into swap in
|
||||
order to make more main memory available for active use.
|
||||
&linux; tends to only move pages to swap as a last resort.
|
||||
The perceived heavier use of swap is balanced by the more
|
||||
efficient use of main memory.</para>
|
||||
This heavy use of swap is balanced by using the extra free
|
||||
memory for cacheing.</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>Note that while &os; is proactive in this regard, it
|
||||
does not arbitrarily decide to swap pages when the system is
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue