From fd49c979983dfbea9adc24a637719554920baab6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 23:43:42 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Add BSD-Patent to the list of OK, but approval required
 licenses.

The EDK2 project has migrated to the BSD-Patent license from
https://opensource.org/licenses/BSDplusPatent for much of their code
base. Get pre-approval for future imports from EDK2 and be explicit
about needing core approval for new components.

Reviewed by:	allanjude@, bcr@, brooks@, seanc@
Approved by:	core@
Differential Revision:	https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20761
---
 .../htdocs/internal/software-license.xml           | 14 +++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/internal/software-license.xml b/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/internal/software-license.xml
index 86913a5771..b8bc43892a 100644
--- a/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/internal/software-license.xml
+++ b/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/internal/software-license.xml
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@
 	  License licensed components or the change of license of
 	  existing components to the Apache License.</p>
 
-	<p>The following components are currently approved:</p>
+	<p>This license is approved for the following components:<p>
 	<ul>
 	  <li>LLVM toolchain and (with LLVM Exceptions) runtime
 	    components.</li>
@@ -87,6 +87,18 @@
 	</ul>
       </li>
 
+      <li>
+	<p>The BSD+Patent License is acceptable for use in some cases.
+	  The Core Team must approve the import of new BSD+Patent
+	  License licensed components or the change of license of
+	  existing components to the BSD+Patent License.</p>
+
+	<p>This license is approved for the following components:<p>
+	<ul>
+	  <li>EDK2 derived code related to UEFI functionality</li>
+	</ul>
+      </li>
+
       <li>
 	<p>Historically, the phrase 'All Rights Reserved.' was
 	included in all copyright notices. The BSD releases had it to