Commit graph

9 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Hiroki Sato
cfd9e12239 www cleanup mega commit:
- Move includes.nav*.sgml to share/sgml/navibar.ent and
   <lang>/share/sgml/nabibar.l10n.ent.

 - Move includes.sgml and includes.xsl to
   share/sgml/common.ent, share/sgml/header.ent, <lang>/share/sgml/l10n.ent,
   and <lang>?share/sgml/header.l10n.ent.

 - Move most of XSLT libraries to share/sgml/*.xsl and
   <lang>/share/sgml/*.xsl.

 - Move news.xml and other *.xml files for the similar purpose
   to share/sgml/*.xml and <lang>/share/sgml/*.xml.

 - Switch to use a custom DTD for HTML document.  Now we use
   "-//FreeBSD//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional-Based Extension", which is
   HTML 4.01 + some entities previously pulled via
   "<!ENTITY % includes SYSTEM "includes.sgml"> %includes;" line.
   The location of entity file will be resolved by using catalog file.

 - Add DOCTYPE declearation to XML documents.  This makes the followings
   possible:

   * Use of &foo; entities for SGML in an XML file instead of defining
     {$foo} as the same content.

   * &symbolic; entities for Latin characters.

 - Duplicated information between SGML and XML, or English and
   translated doc, has been removed as much as possible.
2006-08-19 21:20:54 +00:00
Joel Dahl
0f8976b95c Back out the last revision.
Requested by:	murray
2006-02-22 13:28:14 +00:00
Joel Dahl
7c47498ff1 The FreeBSD internal pages are probably intended for a developer-centric
audience, so use navdevelopers instead of navdocs.
2006-02-21 19:30:28 +00:00
Joel Dahl
3a27b3d2b2 Avoid printing out "Core's Voting Procedures" twice. 2006-02-17 09:44:42 +00:00
Hiroki Sato
85091d3db7 Merge new www design.
Submitted by:	Emily Boyd (emilyboyd at emilyboyd dot com)
Sponsored by:	Google Summer of Code 2005
2005-10-04 20:06:58 +00:00
Warner Losh
a30ef3ecab Although 'Unanimous Consent' appears to be a well defined and used in
the US Senate, Canadian Parliament and Australian Senate, it was
causing some confusion.  After some consultation with Mark Murray,
change this to 'without objection' since often times a plain-speaking
term is preferable to a regionally used term.

Also, clarify that this procedure is to be used when for more mundane
matters that need a sanity check, but don't need the whole, ponderous
voting proceedure that more difficult issues require.  Core members
that read email in any given 48 hour period are trusted enough to know
the difference and to provide the sanity check as necessary.

Reviewed by: markm
2003-12-14 23:01:56 +00:00
Warner Losh
d5b0c34a4c Change a 'be' to 'may' so that a sentence makes sense. Point at the
definition of 'Unanimous Consent' that is used by the US Senate to
mean 'without objection' in routine matters.  Also say as in this
document for non-US folks who may be unfamiliar with the term and
confused by its use.

PR: www/60171 (the 'be' -> 'may' change)
2003-12-13 04:52:45 +00:00
Murray Stokely
f10e415c61 Spell procedure properly. 2003-04-20 21:10:05 +00:00
Jun Kuriyama
5631229d44 Add a note for Core's Voting Procedures.
Drafted by:	imp
Reviewed by:	core
2003-01-04 02:03:58 +00:00