Commit graph

9 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Mark Linimon
4987cf4f33 Point to the newly created Security Branches link. 2005-11-09 01:20:12 +00:00
Simon L. B. Nielsen
9cdbcece83 Correct 5.4-RELEASE's tag name : s/RELENG_5_4_RELEASE/RELENG_5_4_0_RELEASE/.
Noticed by:	glebius
2005-11-04 21:58:28 +00:00
Joel Dahl
911480de43 Remove contraction.
Approved by:	brueffer (mentor)
2005-09-04 22:01:55 +00:00
Giorgos Keramidas
02ef100bc0 Revert 1.5. The entries are not duplicates. The fact that they
differ in only one word is ok, but we may want to fix this in a
slightly different manner.

Pointed out by:	mcl
2005-08-23 11:49:47 +00:00
Giorgos Keramidas
40b9ab662c Remove duplicate list-item.
Submitted by:	Michael Motherwell <mmotherwell@gmail.com>
2005-08-23 05:21:37 +00:00
Ceri Davies
929ef9ccc4 Unparameterise the author and copyright holder.
Discussed with:	linimon
2005-08-17 14:47:25 +00:00
Ceri Davies
c206b7579b More minor smithing. 2005-08-17 10:38:40 +00:00
Ceri Davies
ca0a1af9fc Add id tags to the sectN elements to prevent jade generating filenames.
Run through ispell.
2005-08-17 10:23:09 +00:00
Mark Linimon
e01b784ea1 Add a new article, "How To Choose The Version Of FreeBSD That Is
Right For You."

This article attempts to provide an introduction to such concepts
as Releases, Branches, and STABLE vs. CURRENT, which are currently
scattered around between the FAQ, various Release Engineering documents,
and folklore on the mailing lists.

The material in the FAQ should probably be deleted and this used as
its replacement.  This material does not replace any of the Release
Engineering documentation, but it does attempt to discuss how the
concepts discussed in great detail therein should influence user
decisions on which version to install.  In particular, this article
attempts to inform users about the current thinking of the development
team in terms of how future releases are going to be done.

A companion article comparing e.g. 5.X vs 6.X would be useful but is
outside the scope of this commit.

This article is partially a response to the "Quality of FreeBSD" thread
on freebsd-stable in July 2005 (and its many antecedents).

Submitted for review to:	core, re, secteam
Reviewed by:			imp, wes, remko, simon, and others
2005-08-17 07:18:50 +00:00