fixes, and re-wordings to try and make the text clearer. I also expanded
several contractions, mentioned Bill Fenner's whodid script, and added a
couple of clarifications.
Reviewed by: obrien, nbm
Reviewed by: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com>
are changes to files on the vendor branch a bad idea?", and the answer is
supplied by an (almost) verbatim excerpt from one of Peter Wemm's messages
to committers (<19991129055252.65D5E1C6D@overcee.netplex.com.au>).
on by many people, the SGML conversion has been carried out by the new(ish)
committer, John Baldwin. Cheer's John.
Changes from the submission:
1. It's an article, not a book. I originally thought there was going
to be sufficient content (when you include the committers rules
that are being thrashed out at the moment, and Satoshi's ports
committer stuff) to make this worth being a book. After seeing the
content I changed my mind, so it's an article.
2. Various contractions ("you're" and so on) expanded to make life
a little easier for the translators. Kept one ("Who's Who").
