doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/pam/article.sgml
Ruslan Ermilov 58ba213e1d Fixed grammar nits.
Reviewed by:	des
2002-11-14 13:20:32 +00:00

1100 lines
39 KiB
Text

<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//FreeBSD//DTD DocBook V4.1-Based Extension//EN" [
<!ENTITY % man PUBLIC "-//FreeBSD//ENTITIES DocBook Manual Page Entities//EN">
%man;
]>
<!--
- Copyright (c) 2001,2002 Networks Associates Technology, Inc.
- All rights reserved.
-
- This software was developed for the FreeBSD Project by ThinkSec AS and
- Network Associates Laboratories, the Security Research Division of
- Network Associates, Inc. under DARPA/SPAWAR contract N66001-01-C-8035
- ("CBOSS"), as part of the DARPA CHATS research program.
-
- Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
- modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
- are met:
- 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
- notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
- 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
- notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
- documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
- 3. The name of the author may not be used to endorse or promote
- products derived from this software without specific prior written
- permission.
-
- THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE AUTHOR AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND
- ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
- IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
- ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE
- FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
- DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS
- OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)
- HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT
- LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY
- OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF
- SUCH DAMAGE.
-->
<article>
<articleinfo>
<title>Pluggable Authentication Modules</title>
<pubdate>$FreeBSD$</pubdate>
<abstract>
<para>This article describes the underlying principles and
mechanisms of the Pluggable Authentication Modules (PAM)
library, and explains how to configure PAM, how to integrate
PAM into applications, and how to write PAM modules.</para>
</abstract>
<copyright>
<year>2001</year>
<year>2002</year>
<holder>Networks Associates Technology, Inc.</holder>
</copyright>
<authorgroup>
<author>
<firstname>Dag-Erling</firstname>
<surname>Sm&oslash;rgrav</surname>
<contrib>Contributed by </contrib>
</author>
</authorgroup>
<legalnotice>
<para>This article was written for the FreeBSD Project by
ThinkSec AS and Network Associates Laboratories, the Security
Research Division of Network Associates, Inc. under
DARPA/SPAWAR contract N66001-01-C-8035 (<quote>CBOSS</quote>),
as part of the DARPA CHATS research program.</para>
</legalnotice>
</articleinfo>
<section id="pam-intro">
<title id="pam-intro.title">Introduction</title>
<para>The Pluggable Authentication Modules (PAM) library is a
generalized API for authentication-related services which allows
a system administrator to add new authentication methods simply
by installing new PAM modules, and to modify authentication
policies by editing configuration files.</para>
<para>PAM was defined and developed in 1995 by Vipin Samar and
Charlie Lai of Sun Microsystems, and has not changed much since.
In 1997, the Open Group published the X/Open Single Sign-on
(XSSO) preliminary specification, which standardized the PAM API
and added extensions for single (or rather integrated) sign-on.
At the time of this writing, this specification has not yet been
adopted as a standard.</para>
<para>Although this article focuses primarily on FreeBSD 5.x,
which uses OpenPAM, it should be equally applicable to FreeBSD
4.x, which uses Linux-PAM, and other operating systems such as
Linux and Solaris.</para>
<section id="pam-trademarks">
<title id="pam-trademarks.title">Trademarks</title>
<para>Sun, Sun Microsystems and Solaris are trademarks or
registered trademarks of Sun Microsystems, Inc.</para>
<para>UNIX and The Open Group are trademarks or registered
trademarks of The Open Group.</para>
<para>All other brand or product names mentioned in this
document may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their
respective owners.</para>
</section>
</section>
<section id="pam-terms">
<title id="pam-terms.title">Terms and conventions</title>
<section id="pam-definitions">
<title id="pam-definitions.title">Definitions</title>
<para>The terminology surrounding PAM is rather confused.
Neither Samar and Lai's original paper nor the XSSO
specification made any attempt at formally defining terms for
the various actors and entities involved in PAM, and the terms
that they do use (but do not define) are sometimes misleading
and ambiguous. The first attempt at establishing a consistent
and unambiguous terminology was a whitepaper written by Andrew
G. Morgan (author of Linux-PAM) in 1999. While Morgan's
choice of terminology was a huge leap forward, it is in this
author's opinion by no means perfect. What follows is an
attempt, heavily inspired by Morgan, to define precise and
unambiguous terms for all actors and entities involved in
PAM.</para>
<glosslist>
<glossentry>
<glossterm>account</glossterm>
<glossdef>
<para>The set of credentials the applicant is requesting
from the arbitrator.</para>
</glossdef>
</glossentry>
<glossentry>
<glossterm>applicant</glossterm>
<glossdef>
<para>The user or entity requesting authentication.</para>
</glossdef>
</glossentry>
<glossentry>
<glossterm>arbitrator</glossterm>
<glossdef>
<para>The user or entity who has the privileges necessary
to verify the applicant's credentials and the authority
to grant or deny the request.</para>
</glossdef>
</glossentry>
<glossentry>
<glossterm>chain</glossterm>
<glossdef>
<para>A sequence of modules that will be invoked in
response to a PAM request. The chain includes
information about the order in which to invoke the
modules, what arguments to pass to them, and how to
interpret the results.</para>
</glossdef>
</glossentry>
<glossentry>
<glossterm>client</glossterm>
<glossdef>
<para>The application responsible for initiating an
authentication request on behalf of the applicant and
for obtaining the necessary authentication information
from him.</para>
</glossdef>
</glossentry>
<glossentry>
<glossterm>facility</glossterm>
<glossdef>
<para>One of the four basic groups of functionality
provided by PAM: authentication, account management,
session management and authentication token
update.</para>
</glossdef>
</glossentry>
<glossentry>
<glossterm>module</glossterm>
<glossdef>
<para>A collection of one or more related functions
implementing a particular authentication facility,
gathered into a single (normally dynamically loadable)
binary file and identified by a single name.</para>
</glossdef>
</glossentry>
<glossentry>
<glossterm>policy</glossterm>
<glossdef>
<para>The complete set of configuration statements
describing how to handle PAM requests for a particular
service. A policy normally consists of four chains, one
for each facility, though some services do not use all
four facilities.</para>
</glossdef>
</glossentry>
<glossentry>
<glossterm>server</glossterm>
<glossdef>
<para>The application acting on behalf of the arbitrator
to converse with the client, retrieve authentication
information, verify the applicant's credentials and
grant or deny requests.</para>
</glossdef>
</glossentry>
<glossentry>
<glossterm>service</glossterm>
<glossdef>
<para>A class of servers providing similar or related
functionality and requiring similar authentication. PAM
policies are defined on a per-service basis, so all
servers that claim the same service name will be subject
to the same policy.</para>
</glossdef>
</glossentry>
<glossentry>
<glossterm>session</glossterm>
<glossdef>
<para>The context within which service is rendered to the
applicant by the server. One of PAM's four facilities,
session management, is concerned exclusively with
setting up and tearing down this context.</para>
</glossdef>
</glossentry>
<glossentry>
<glossterm>token</glossterm>
<glossdef>
<para>A chunk of information associated with the account,
such as a password or passphrase, which the applicant
must provide to prove his identity.</para>
</glossdef>
</glossentry>
<glossentry>
<glossterm>transaction</glossterm>
<glossdef>
<para>A sequence of requests from the same applicant to
the same instance of the same server, beginning with
authentication and session set-up and ending with
session tear-down.</para>
</glossdef>
</glossentry>
</glosslist>
</section>
<section id="pam-usage-examples">
<title id="pam-usage-examples.title">Usage examples</title>
<para>This section aims to illustrate the meanings of some of
the terms defined above by way of a handful of simple
examples.</para>
<section>
<title>Client and server are one</title>
<para>This simple example shows <literal>alice</literal>
&man.su.1;'ing to <literal>root</literal>.</para>
<screen>&prompt.user; <userinput>whoami</userinput>
alice
&prompt.user; <userinput>ls -l `which su`</userinput>
-r-sr-xr-x 1 root wheel 10744 Dec 6 19:06 /usr/bin/su
&prompt.user; <userinput>su -</userinput>
Password: <userinput>xi3kiune</userinput>
&prompt.root; whoami
root
</screen>
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>The applicant is <literal>alice</literal>.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>The account is <literal>root</literal>.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>The &man.su.1; process is both client and
server.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>The authentication token is
<literal>xi3kiune</literal>.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>The arbitrator is <literal>root</literal>, which is
why &man.su.1; is setuid <literal>root</literal>.</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</section>
<section>
<title>Client and server are separate</title>
<para>The example below shows <literal>eve</literal> try to
initiate an &man.ssh.1; connection to
<literal>login.example.com</literal>, ask to log in as
<literal>bob</literal>, and succeed. Bob should have chosen
a better password!</para>
<screen>&prompt.user; <userinput>whoami</userinput>
eve
&prompt.user; <userinput>ssh bob@login.example.com</userinput>
bob@login.example.com's password: <userinput>god</userinput>
Last login: Thu Oct 11 09:52:57 2001 from 192.168.0.1
Copyright (c) 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1990, 1991, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE (LOGIN) #4: Tue Nov 27 18:10:34 PST 2001
Welcome to FreeBSD!
&prompt.user;</screen>
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>The applicant is <literal>eve</literal>.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>The client is Eve's &man.ssh.1; process.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>The server is the &man.sshd.8; process on
<literal>login.example.com</literal></para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>The account is <literal>bob</literal>.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>The authentication token is
<literal>god</literal>.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>Although this is not shown in this example, the
arbitrator is <literal>root</literal>.</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</section>
<section>
<title>Sample policy</title>
<para>The following is FreeBSD's default policy for
<literal>sshd</literal>:</para>
<programlisting>sshd auth required pam_nologin.so no_warn
sshd auth required pam_unix.so no_warn try_first_pass
sshd account required pam_login_access.so
sshd account required pam_unix.so
sshd session required pam_lastlog.so no_fail
sshd password required pam_permit.so</programlisting>
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>This policy applies to the <literal>sshd</literal>
service (which is not necessarily restricted to the
&man.sshd.8; server.)</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para><literal>auth</literal>, <literal>account</literal>,
<literal>session</literal> and
<literal>password</literal> are facilities.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para><filename>pam_nologin.so</filename>,
<filename>pam_unix.so</filename>,
<filename>pam_login_access.so</filename>,
<filename>pam_lastlog.so</filename> and
<filename>pam_permit.so</filename> are modules. It is
clear from this example that
<filename>pam_unix.so</filename> provides at least two
facilities (authentication and account
management.)</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</section>
</section>
<section id="pam-conventions">
<title id="pam-conventions.title">Conventions</title>
<para><!--XXX-->This section has not yet been written.</para>
</section>
</section>
<section id="pam-essentials">
<title id="pam-essentials.title">PAM Essentials</title>
<section id="pam-facilities-primitives">
<title id="pam-facilities-primitives.title">Facilities and
primitives</title>
<para>The PAM API offers six different authentication primitives
grouped in four facilities, which are described below.</para>
<variablelist>
<varlistentry>
<term><literal>auth</literal></term>
<listitem>
<para><emphasis>Authentication.</emphasis> This facility
concerns itself with authenticating the applicant and
establishing the account credentials. It provides two
primitives:</para>
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>&man.pam.authenticate.3; authenticates the
applicant, usually by requesting an authentication
token and comparing it with a value stored in a
database or obtained from an authentication
server.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>&man.pam.setcred.3; establishes account
credentials such as user ID, group membership and
resource limits.</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term><literal>account</literal></term>
<listitem>
<para><emphasis>Account management.</emphasis> This
facility handles non-authentication-related issues of
account availability, such as access restrictions based
on the time of day or the server's work load. It
provides a single primitive:</para>
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>&man.pam.acct.mgmt.3; verifies that the
requested account is available.</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term><literal>session</literal></term>
<listitem>
<para><emphasis>Session management.</emphasis> This
facility handles tasks associated with session set-up
and tear-down, such as login accounting. It provides
two primitives:</para>
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>&man.pam.open.session.3; performs tasks
associated with session set-up: add an entry in the
<filename>utmp</filename> and
<filename>wtmp</filename> databases, start an SSH
agent, etc.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>&man.pam.close.session.3; performs tasks
associated with session tear-down: add an entry in
the <filename>utmp</filename> and
<filename>wtmp</filename> databases, stop the SSH
agent, etc.</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term><literal>password</literal></term>
<listitem>
<para><emphasis>Password management.</emphasis> This
facility is used to change the authentication token
associated with an account, either because it has
expired or because the user wishes to change it. It
provides a single primitive:</para>
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>&man.pam.chauthtok.3; changes the authentication
token, optionally verifying that it is sufficiently
hard to guess, has not been used previously,
etc.</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
</variablelist>
</section>
<section id="pam-modules">
<title id="pam-modules.title">Modules</title>
<para>Modules are a very central concept in PAM; after all,
they are the <quote>M</quote> in <quote>PAM</quote>. A PAM
module is a self-contained piece of program code that
implements the primitives in one or more facilities for one
particular mechanism; possible mechanisms for the
authentication facility, for instance, include the UNIX
password database, NIS, LDAP and Radius.</para>
<section id="pam-module-naming">
<title id="pam-module-naming.title">Module Naming</title>
<para>FreeBSD implements each mechanism in a single module,
named
<literal>pam_<replaceable>mechanism</replaceable>.so</literal>
(for instance, <literal>pam_unix.so</literal> for the Unix
mechanism.) Other implementations sometimes have separate
modules for separate facilities, and include the facility
name as well as the mechanism name in the module name. To
name one example, Solaris has a
<literal>pam_dial_auth.so.1</literal> module which is
commonly used to authenticate dialup users.</para>
</section>
<section id="pam-module-versioning">
<title id="pam-module-versioning.title">Module Versioning</title>
<para>FreeBSD's original PAM implementation, based on
Linux-PAM, did not use version numbers for PAM modules.
This would commonly cause problems with legacy applications,
which might be linked against older versions of the system
libraries, as there was no way to load a matching version of
the required modules.</para>
<para>OpenPAM, on the other hand, looks for modules that have
the same version number as the PAM library (currently 2),
and only falls back to an unversioned module if no versioned
module could be loaded. Thus legacy modules can be provided
for legacy applications, while allowing new (or newly built)
applications to take advantage of the most recent
modules.</para>
<para>Although Solaris PAM modules commonly have a version
number, they're not truly versioned, because the number is a
part of the module name and must be included in the
configuration.</para>
</section>
</section>
<section id="pam-chains-policies">
<title id="pam-chains-policies.title">Chains and
policies</title>
<para>When a server initiates a PAM transaction, the PAM library
tries to load a policy for the service specified in the
&man.pam.start.3; call. The policy specifies how
authentication requests should be processed, and is defined in
a configuration file. This is the other central concept in
PAM: the possibility for the admin to tune the system security
policy (in the wider sense of the word) simply by editing a
text file.</para>
<para>A policy consists of four chains, one for each of the four
PAM facilities. Each chain is a sequence of configuration
statements, each specifying a module to invoke, some
(optional) parameters to pass to the module, and a control
flag that describes how to interpret the return code from the
module.</para>
<para>Understanding the control flags is essential to
understanding PAM configuration files. There are four
different control flags:</para>
<variablelist>
<varlistentry>
<term><literal>required</literal></term>
<listitem>
<para>Success is required, but the chain continues no
matter what this module returns, so that later modules
can override it.</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term><literal>requisite</literal></term>
<listitem>
<para>A negative result from this module will immediately
terminate the chain and deny the request.</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term><literal>sufficient</literal></term>
<listitem>
<para>A positive result from this module will immediately
terminate the chain and grant the request. On failure,
the chain continues.</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term><literal>optional</literal></term>
<listitem>
<para>A negative result from this module will be
ignored.</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
</variablelist>
<para>When a server invokes one of the six PAM primitives, PAM
retrieves the chain for the facility the primitive belongs to,
and invokes each of the modules listed in the chain, in the
order they are listed, until it reaches the end, or determines
that no further processing is necessary (either because a
<literal>sufficient</literal> module succeeded, or because a
<literal>requisite</literal> module failed.) The request is
granted if and only if at least one module was invoked, and
all non-optional modules succeeded.</para>
<para>Note that it is possible, though not very common, to have
the same module listed several times in the same chain. For
instance, a module that looks up user names and passwords in a
directory server could be invoked multiple times with
different parameters specifying different directory servers to
contact. PAM treat different occurrences of the same module
in the same chain as different, unrelated modules.</para>
</section>
<section id="pam-transactions">
<title id="pam-transactions.title">Transactions</title>
<para>The lifecycle of a typical PAM transaction is described
below. Note that if any of these steps fails, the server
should report a suitable error message to the client and abort
the transaction.</para>
<orderedlist>
<listitem>
<para>If necessary, the server obtains arbitrator
credentials through a mechanism independent of
PAM&mdash;most commonly by virtue of having been started
by <literal>root</literal>, or of being setuid
<literal>root</literal>.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>The server calls &man.pam.start.3; to initialize the
PAM library and specify its service name and the target
account, and register a suitable conversation
function.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>The server obtains various information relating to the
transaction (such as the applicant's user name and the
name of the host the client runs on) and submits it to PAM
using &man.pam.set.item.3;.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>The server calls &man.pam.authenticate.3; to
authenticate the applicant.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>The server calls &man.pam.acct.mgmt.3; to verify that the
requested account is available and valid. If the password
is correct but has expired, &man.pam.acct.mgmt.3; will
return <literal>PAM_NEW_AUTHTOK_REQD</literal> instead of
<literal>PAM_SUCCESS</literal>.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>If the previous step returned
<literal>PAM_NEW_AUTHTOK_REQD</literal>, the server now
calls &man.pam.chauthtok.3; to force the client to change
the authentication token for the requested account.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>Now that the applicant has been properly
authenticated, the server calls &man.pam.setcred.3; to
establish the credentials of the requested account. It is
able to do this because it acts on behalf of the
arbitrator, and holds the arbitrator's credentials.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>Once the correct credentials have been established,
the server calls &man.pam.open.session.3; to set up the
session.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>The server now performs whatever service the client
requested&mdash;for instance, provide the applicant with a
shell.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>Once the server is done serving the client, it calls
&man.pam.close.session.3; to tear down the session.</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>Finally, the server calls &man.pam.end.3; to notify
the PAM library that it is done and that it can release
whatever resources it has allocated in the course of the
transaction.</para>
</listitem>
</orderedlist>
</section>
</section>
<section id="pam-config">
<title id="pam-config.title">PAM Configuration</title>
<section id="pam-config-file-locations">
<title id="pam-config-file-locations.title">Location of
configuration files</title>
<para>The traditional PAM configuration file is
<filename>/etc/pam.conf</filename>. This file contains all
the PAM policies for your system. Each line of the file
describes one step in a chain, as shown below:</para>
<programlisting>login auth required pam_nologin.so no_warn</programlisting>
<para>The fields are, in order: service name, facility name,
control flag, module name, and module arguments. Any
additional fields are interpreted as additional module
arguments.</para>
<para>A separate chain is constructed for each service /
facility pair, so while the order in which lines for the same
service and facility appear is significant, the order in which
the individual services and facilities are listed is
not&mdash;except that entries for the <literal>other</literal>
service, which serves as a fall-back, should come last. The
examples in the original PAM paper grouped configuration lines
by facility, and Solaris' stock <filename>pam.conf</filename>
still does that, but FreeBSD's stock configuration groups
configuration lines by service. Either way is fine; either
way makes equal sense.</para>
<para>OpenPAM and Linux-PAM offer an alternate configuration
mechanism, where policies are contained in separate files,
named for the service they apply to, in
<filename>/etc/pam.d/</filename>, with only four fields
instead of five&mdash;the service name field is omitted. This
is the preferred mechanism in FreeBSD 5.x. Note, however,
that if <filename>/etc/pam.conf</filename> exists, and
contains configuration statements for services which do not
have a specific policy in <filename>/etc/pam.d/</filename>, it
will be used as a fall-back for these services.</para>
<para>The great advantage of <filename>/etc/pam.d/</filename>
over <filename>/etc/pam.conf</filename> is that it is possible
to use the same policy for multiple services by linking each
service name to a same policy file. For instance, to use the
same policy for the <literal>su</literal> and
<literal>sudo</literal> services, one could do as
follows:</para>
<screen>&prompt.root; <userinput>cd /etc/pam.d</userinput>
&prompt.root; <userinput>ln -s su sudo</userinput></screen>
<para>This works because the service name is determined from the
file name rather than specified in the policy file, so the
same file can be used for multiple differently-named
services.</para>
<para>One other advantage is that third-party software can
easily install policies for their services without the need to
edit <filename>/etc/pam.conf</filename>. True to the FreeBSD
tradition, OpenPAM will even look for policy files in
<filename>/usr/local/etc/pam.d/</filename> if no configuration
for the requested service is present in
<filename>/etc/pam.d/</filename> or
<filename>/etc/pam.conf</filename>.</para>
<para>Finally, whichever configuration mechanism you choose, the
<quote>magic</quote> policy <literal>other</literal> is used
as a fall-back for any service that does not have its own
policy.</para>
</section>
<section id="pam-config-breakdown">
<title id="pam-config-breakdown.title">Breakdown of a
configuration line</title>
<para>As explained in the <link
linkend="pam-config-file-locations"
endterm="pam-config-file-locations.title"></link> section,
each line in <filename>/etc/pam.conf</filename> consists of
four or more fields: the service name, the facility name, the
control flag, the module name, and zero or more module
arguments.</para>
<para>The service name is generally (though not always) the name
of the application the statement applies to. If you are
unsure, refer to the individual application's documentation to
determine what service name it uses.</para>
<para>Note that if you use <filename>/etc/pam.d/</filename>
instead of <filename>/etc/pam.conf</filename>, the service
name is specified by the name of the policy file, and omitted
from the actual configuration lines, which then start with the
facility name.</para>
<para>The facility is one of the four facility keywords
described in the <link linkend="pam-facilities-primitives"
endterm="pam-facilities-primitives.title"></link>
section.</para>
<para>Likewise, the control flag is one of the four keywords
described in the <link linkend="pam-chains-policies"
endterm="pam-chains-policies.title"></link> section,
describing how to interpret the return code from the module.
Linux-PAM supports an alternate syntax that lets you specify
the action to associate with each possible return code, but
this should be avoided as it is non-standard and closely tied
in with the way Linux-PAM dispatches service calls (which
differs greatly from the way Solaris and OpenPAM do it.)
Unsurprisingly, OpenPAM does not support this syntax.</para>
</section>
<section id="pam-policies">
<title id="pam-policies.title">Policies</title>
<para>To configure PAM correctly, it is essential to understand
how chains are executed.</para>
<para>When an application calls &man.pam.start.3;, the PAM
library loads the configuration for the specified service and
constructs four module chains (one for each facility.) If the
configuration does not specify any modules for one or more
facilities, the configuration for the <literal>other</literal>
service is used instead for these facilities.</para>
<para>When the application later calls one of the six PAM
primitives, the PAM library retrieves the chain for the
corresponding facility and calls the appropriate service
function in each module listed in the chain, in the order in
which they were listed in the configuration. After each call
to a service function, the module type and the error code
returned by the service function are used to determine what
happens next. With a few exceptions, which we will discuss
later, the following table applies:</para>
<table>
<title>PAM chain execution summary</title>
<tgroup cols="4">
<colspec colwidth="1*" colname="type">
<colspec colwidth="1*" colname="success">
<colspec colwidth="1*" colname="ignore">
<colspec colwidth="1*" colname="other">
<thead>
<row>
<entry colname="type"></entry>
<entry colname="success"><literal>PAM_SUCCESS</literal></entry>
<entry colname="ignore"><literal>PAM_IGNORE</literal></entry>
<entry colname="other"><literal>other</literal></entry>
</row>
</thead>
<tbody>
<row>
<entry colname="type">required</entry>
<entry colname="success">-</entry>
<entry colname="ignore">-</entry>
<entry colname="other">fail = true</entry>
</row>
<row>
<entry colname="type">requisite</entry>
<entry colname="success">-</entry>
<entry colname="ignore">-</entry>
<entry colname="other">fail = true, break</entry>
</row>
<row>
<entry colname="type">sufficient</entry>
<entry colname="success">if (!fail) break</entry>
<entry colname="ignore">-</entry>
<entry colname="other">fail = true</entry>
</row>
<row>
<entry colname="type">optional</entry>
<entry colname="success">-</entry>
<entry colname="ignore">-</entry>
<entry colname="other">-</entry>
</row>
</tbody>
</tgroup>
</table>
<para>If <varname>fail</varname> is true at the end of a chain,
or when a <quote>break</quote> is reached, the dispatcher
returns the error code returned by the first module that
failed. Otherwise, it returns
<literal>PAM_SUCCESS</literal>.</para>
<para>The first exception of note is that the error code
<literal>PAM_NEW_AUTHTOK_REQD</literal> is treated like a
success, except that if no module failed, and at least one
module returned <literal>PAM_NEW_AUTHTOK_REQD</literal>, the
dispatcher will return
<literal>PAM_NEW_AUTHTOK_REQD</literal>.</para>
<para>The second exception is that &man.pam.setcred.3; treats
<literal>sufficient</literal> modules as if they were
<literal>required</literal>.</para>
<para>The third and final exception is that
&man.pam.chauthtok.3; runs the entire chain twice (once for
preliminary checks and once to actually set the password), and
in the preliminary phase it treats
<literal>sufficient</literal> modules as if they were
<literal>required</literal>.</para>
</section>
</section>
<section id="pam-freebsd-modules">
<title id="pam-freebsd-modules.title">FreeBSD PAM Modules</title>
<para><!--XXX-->This section has not yet been written.</para>
</section>
<section id="pam-appl-prog">
<title id="pam-appl-prog.title">PAM Application Programming</title>
<para><!--XXX-->This section has not yet been written.</para>
<!--
Note that while the original PAM paper includes a sample PAM
application that calls pam_open_session() before pam_setcred(),
the Linux-PAM documentation states that pam_setcred() must be
called first, which makes more sense.
Also note that the example in the paper calls setgid(),
initgroups() and setuid() itself rather than rely on
pam_setcred() to do it.
-->
</section>
<section id="pam-module-prog">
<title id="pam-module-prog.title">PAM Module Programming</title>
<para><!--XXX-->This section has not yet been written.</para>
</section>
<appendix id="pam-sample-appl">
<title id="pam-sample-appl.title">Sample PAM Application</title>
<para>The following is a minimal implementation of &man.su.1;
using PAM. Note that it uses the OpenPAM-specific
&man.openpam.ttyconv.3; conversation function, which is
prototyped in <filename
class="headerfile">security/openpam.h</filename>. If you wish
build this application on a system with a different PAM library,
you will have to provide your own conversation function. A
robust conversation function is surprisingly difficult to
implement; the one presented in the <link
linkend="pam-sample-conv"
endterm="pam-sample-conv.title"></link> appendix is a good
starting point, but should not be used in real-world
applications.</para>
<programlisting><inlinegraphic fileref="pam_app.c"
format="linespecific"></programlisting>
</appendix>
<appendix id="pam-sample-module">
<title id="pam-sample-module.title">Sample PAM Module</title>
<para>The following is a minimal implementation of
&man.pam.unix.8;, offering only authentication services. It
should build and run with most PAM implementations, but takes
advantage of OpenPAM extensions if available: note the use of
&man.pam.get.authtok.3;, which enormously simplifies prompting
the user for a password.</para>
<programlisting><inlinegraphic fileref="pam_module.c"
format="linespecific"></programlisting>
</appendix>
<appendix id="pam-sample-conv">
<title id="pam-sample-conv.title">Sample PAM Conversation
Function</title>
<para>The conversation function presented below is a greatly
simplified version of OpenPAM's &man.openpam.ttyconv.3;. It is
fully functional, and should give the reader a good idea of how
a conversation function should behave, but it is far too simple
for real-world use. Even if you're not using OpenPAM, feel free
to download the source code and adapt &man.openpam.ttyconv.3; to
your uses; we believe it to be as robust as a tty-oriented
conversation function can reasonably get.</para>
<programlisting><inlinegraphic fileref="pam_conv.c"
format="linespecific"></programlisting>
</appendix>
<bibliography id="pam-further">
<title id="pam-further.title">Further Reading</title>
<abstract>
<para>This is a list of documents relevant to PAM and related
issues. It is by no means complete.</para>
</abstract>
<bibliodiv>
<title>Papers</title>
<biblioentry>
<title><ulink
url="http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/pam/pam.external.pdf">
Making Login Services Independent of Authentication
Technologies</ulink></title>
<authorgroup>
<author>
<surname>Samar</surname>
<firstname>Vipin</firstname>
</author>
<author>
<surname>Lai</surname>
<firstname>Charlie</firstname>
</author>
</authorgroup>
<orgname>Sun Microsystems</orgname>
</biblioentry>
<biblioentry>
<title><ulink
url="http://www.opengroup.org/pubs/catalog/p702.htm">X/Open
Single Sign-on Preliminary Specification</ulink></title>
<orgname>The Open Group</orgname>
<isbn>1-85912-144-6</isbn>
<pubdate>June 1997</pubdate>
</biblioentry>
<biblioentry>
<title><ulink
url="http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/libs/pam/pre/doc/current-draft.txt">
Pluggable Authentication Modules</ulink></title>
<author>
<surname>Morgan</surname>
<firstname>Andrew</firstname>
<othername role="mi">G.</othername>
</author>
<pubdate>October 6, 1999</pubdate>
</biblioentry>
</bibliodiv>
<bibliodiv>
<title>User Manuals</title>
<biblioentry>
<title><ulink
url="http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/pam/pam.admin.pdf">PAM
Administration</ulink></title>
<orgname>Sun Microsystems</orgname>
</biblioentry>
</bibliodiv>
<bibliodiv>
<title>Related Web pages</title>
<biblioentry>
<title><ulink url="http://openpam.sourceforge.net/">OpenPAM homepage</ulink></title>
<author>
<surname>Sm&oslash;rgrav</surname>
<firstname>Dag-Erling</firstname>
</author>
<orgname>ThinkSec AS</orgname>
</biblioentry>
<biblioentry>
<title><ulink url="http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/libs/pam/">Linux-PAM homepage</ulink></title>
<author>
<surname>Morgan</surname>
<firstname>Andrew</firstname>
<othername role="mi">G.</othername>
</author>
</biblioentry>
<biblioentry>
<title><ulink url="http://wwws.sun.com/software/solaris/pam/">Solaris PAM homepage</ulink></title>
<orgname>Sun Microsystems</orgname>
</biblioentry>
</bibliodiv>
</bibliography>
</article>