doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/platforms/ia64/index.xml
Hiroki Sato 52f6d56540 - Use /usr/bin/svnlite as SVN if available.
- Replace /XML/{doc,www}/ with /XML/ in SysId.
- Remove empty stylesheets in share/xsl and point share/xml/empty.xsl via
  XML catalog instead.
- Change the L10N layer in freebsd-*.xsl not to use localized XSLT
  stylesheets directly.
- Move share/xsl/* to share/xml and remove share/xsl.
- Remove obsolete share/web2c/pdftex.def.
2013-11-13 06:10:37 +00:00

69 lines
2.3 KiB
XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//FreeBSD//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional-Based Extension//EN"
"http://www.FreeBSD.org/XML/share/xml/xhtml10-freebsd.dtd" [
<!ENTITY email "freebsd-ia64">
<!ENTITY title "FreeBSD/ia64 Project">
]>
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<title>&title;</title>
<cvs:keyword xmlns:cvs="http://www.FreeBSD.org/XML/CVS">$FreeBSD$</cvs:keyword>
</head>
<body class="navinclude.developers">
<img align="right" alt="McKinley die" src="mckinley-die.png"/>
<p>Search the ia64 mailing list archives:</p>
<form action="http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/search.cgi" method="get">
<input name="words" size="50" type="text"/>
<input name="max" type="hidden" value="25"/>
<input name="source" type="hidden" value="freebsd-ia64"/>
<input type="submit" value="Go"/>
</form>
<h3><a name="toc">Table Of Contents</a></h3>
<ul>
<li>
<a href="#intro">Introduction</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="#status">Current status</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="todo.html">What Needs To Be Done</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="machines.html">Hardware List</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="refs.html">References</a>
</li>
</ul>
<h3><a name="intro">Introduction</a></h3>
<p>The FreeBSD/ia64 project pages contain information about the
FreeBSD port to Intel's IA-64 architecture; officially known as
the Intel Itanium&reg; Processor Family (IPF). As with the port
itself, these pages are still mostly a work in progress.</p>
<h3><a name="status">Current status</a></h3>
<p>The ia64 port is still considered a tier 2 platform. This boils
down to not being fully supported by our security officer, release
engineers and toolchain maintainers. In practice however the
distinction between a tier 1 platform (which is fully supported)
and a tier 2 platform is not as strict as it seems. In almost all
aspects the ia64 port is a tier 1 platform.
<br/>
From a developer point of view there's an advantage to have the ia64
port be a tier 2 platform for a while longer. We still have a couple
of ABI breaking changes in the pipeline and having to maintain
backward compatibility this early in a ports life is less than
ideal.</p>
</body>
</html>