The claim that there were no "substantive" commits to this article are made without any knowledge of internals of re@. Several parts of the removed content is still relevant for 8.x, which we do still support. Furthermore, this particular article, outdated or not, falls under RE territory, and these drive-by commits were not approved. Approved by: re (implicit) |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
article.xml | ||
extra.css | ||
Makefile |