os/doc
3
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Spellcheck.

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Murray Stokely 2003-04-20 21:28:05 +00:00
parent c342196b7a
commit 4296e9bb3a
Notes: svn2git 2020-12-08 03:00:23 +00:00 
svn path=/www/; revision=16640
3 changed files with 12 additions and 12 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

14
en/events/2002/bsdcon-devsummit.sgml
View file

@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" [
<!ENTITY base CDATA "../..">
<!ENTITY date "$FreeBSD: www/en/events/2002/bsdcon-devsummit.sgml,v 1.7 2002/05/08 12:52:02 gioria Exp $">
<!ENTITY date "$FreeBSD: www/en/events/2002/bsdcon-devsummit.sgml,v 1.8 2002/05/16 01:49:51 trhodes Exp $">
<!ENTITY email 'hackers'>
<!ENTITY title "BSDCon 2002 FreeBSD Developer Summit">
<!ENTITY stylesheet "&base;/events/events.css">
@ -239,7 +239,7 @@
gets called which passes a version to the api to check it. Another
thing you get from init.</p>
<p>In the solaris case there is a single number. How do I automate
<p>In the Solaris case there is a single number. How do I automate
that versioning check with more interfaces?</p>
<p><strong class="speaker">Paul</strong> : I don't think we should
@ -283,7 +283,7 @@
<p><strong class="speaker">Justin</strong> : The only saving grace is
that the transition can be mechanical.</p>
<p><strong class="speaker">PoulHK</strong> : Why not a compatability
<p><strong class="speaker">PoulHK</strong> : Why not a compatibility
layer while doing conversion?</p>
<p><strong class="speaker">Justin</strong> : Sure and then you could
@ -387,7 +387,7 @@
<h3>PowerPC - Benno Rice</h3>
<p>Has now commited the page map code with something more sane. Has
<p>Has now committed the page map code with something more sane. Has
also got the system to the point where it tries to mount root.
Turning on invariants blows it up. Hoping to get to single user in
a month or so on the simulator. With some luck we may get to
@ -1257,7 +1257,7 @@
<p><strong class="speaker">Robert</strong> : I can't say. Part of our
contract was to release as open source.</p>
<p><strong class="speaker">Alfred</strong> : About compatability. How
<p><strong class="speaker">Alfred</strong> : About compatibility. How
compatible are we with others?</p>
<p><strong class="speaker">Robert</strong> : We've tried to follow the
@ -1528,7 +1528,7 @@
<p><strong class="speaker">John</strong> : Current Status cont.
We've taken more time to get it right. We've added common things
like semaphores, reader writer locks. I've been making the kernel
fully pre-emptible. I've commited half of this to current now. The
fully pre-emptible. I've committed half of this to current now. The
ktrace is another infrastructural issue so its feasible.</p>
<p><strong class="speaker">David</strong> : Then general framework
@ -1686,7 +1686,7 @@
<p><strong class="speaker">Doug</strong> : I don't know how tied you
are to the release schedule. If you want to spend all of October
polishing. If we go backwards from October we can do Release 1 on
May 15. April 1st is too soon and puts you in weird catagories
May 15. April 1st is too soon and puts you in weird categories
relative to Usenix.</p>
<p><strong class="speaker">Murray</strong> : The way we have it set up

6
en/events/2002/usenix-devsummit.sgml
View file

@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" [
<!ENTITY base CDATA "../..">
<!ENTITY date "$FreeBSD: www/en/events/2002/usenix-devsummit.sgml,v 1.10 2003/03/07 22:05:27 murray Exp $">
<!ENTITY date "$FreeBSD: www/en/events/2002/usenix-devsummit.sgml,v 1.11 2003/03/08 00:49:48 murray Exp $">
<!ENTITY email 'hackers'>
<!ENTITY break '<hr><center>BREAK</center><hr>'>
<!ENTITY title "Usenix 2002 FreeBSD Developer Summit III">
@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ it might be reasonable then to take the space hit and always have the
debugging in but turn it on and off with sysctl.</p>
<p><strong class="speaker">rwatson</strong> : We should commit an optimized
kernel configuration and benchmarking guidlines to the tree as
kernel configuration and benchmarking guidelines to the tree as
well.</p>
</div>
@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ look like? Different architectures and different numbers of
processors.</p>
<p><strong class="speaker">rwatson</strong> : Can we make a multi-processor
run uni-procesor.</p>
run uni-processor.</p>
<p><strong class="speaker">alfred</strong> : Run queue and scheduler stuff?</p>

4
en/projects/c99/index.sgml
View file

@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" [
<!ENTITY base CDATA "../..">
<!ENTITY date "$FreeBSD: www/en/projects/c99/index.sgml,v 1.79 2003/02/18 01:10:25 mike Exp $">
<!ENTITY date "$FreeBSD: www/en/projects/c99/index.sgml,v 1.80 2003/02/27 16:48:18 mike Exp $">
<!ENTITY title "FreeBSD C99 and POSIX Conformance Project">
<!ENTITY email 'standards'>
<!ENTITY % includes SYSTEM "../../includes.sgml"> %includes;
@ -1928,7 +1928,7 @@
<ul class="list">
<li>
<p>A new <a href="http://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-feb-2002-apr-2002.html#FreeBSD-C99-&-POSIX-Conformance-Project">status
report</a> on the state of the project, covering Februrary through
report</a> on the state of the project, covering February through
April, has been produced.</p>
</li>
</ul>