Correct some typos in the links.

PR:		140724
This commit is contained in:
Brad Davis 2009-11-27 19:00:00 +00:00
parent e29e30a507
commit c776c09754
Notes: svn2git 2020-12-08 03:00:23 +00:00
svn path=/www/; revision=34976

View file

@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//FreeBSD//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional-Based Extension//EN" [
<!ENTITY base CDATA "..">
<!ENTITY date "$FreeBSD: www/en/marketing/os-comparison.sgml,v 1.10 2005/12/19 13:38:46 pav Exp $">
<!ENTITY date "$FreeBSD: www/en/marketing/os-comparison.sgml,v 1.11 2006/08/19 21:20:37 hrs Exp $">
<!ENTITY email 'marketing'>
<!ENTITY title "FreeBSD vs. Linux vs. Windows 2000">
<!ENTITY % navinclude.about "INCLUDE">
@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ href="#3">3</a></sup></small>.</p>
performance and consistency differences between journaled and soft
updates consistency mechanisms. This paper is available online from
<a
href="http://www.ece.cmu.edu/~gnager/papers/usenix2000.ps">http://www.ece.cmu.edu/~gnager/papers/usenix2000.ps</a>.
href="http://www.ece.cmu.edu/~ganger/papers/usenix2000.ps">http://www.ece.cmu.edu/~ganger/papers/usenix2000.ps</a>.
This paper also discusses two different journaling implementations
based on FFS and developed on FreeBSD. Clearly, FreeBSD is at the
forefront of filesystem research and this is the source of many of
@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ href="#3">3</a></sup></small>.</p>
<p>"Soft Updates: A Technique for Eliminating Most Synchronous Writes
in the Fast Filesystem" by Marshall Kirk McKusick and Gregory
R. Ganger.<br/> <a
href="http://www.ece.cmu.edu/~gnager/papers/mckusick99.ps">http://www.ece.cmu.edu/~gnager/papers/mckusick99.ps</a>.</p>
href="http://www.ece.cmu.edu/~ganger/papers/mckusick99.ps">http://www.ece.cmu.edu/~ganger/papers/mckusick99.ps</a>.</p>
<a name="2"></a>
<h2>Performance Benchmarks</h2>