os/doc
3
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Add BSD-Patent to the list of OK, but approval required licenses.

Browse source 
The EDK2 project has migrated to the BSD-Patent license from
https://opensource.org/licenses/BSDplusPatent for much of their code
base. Get pre-approval for future imports from EDK2 and be explicit
about needing core approval for new components.

Reviewed by:	allanjude@, bcr@, brooks@, seanc@
Approved by:	core@
Differential Revision:	https://reviews.freebsd.org/D20761
This commit is contained in:
Warner Losh 2019-06-25 23:43:42 +00:00
parent 479bb74e64
commit fd49c97998
Notes: svn2git 2020-12-08 03:00:23 +00:00 
svn path=/head/; revision=53194
1 changed files with 13 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

14
en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/internal/software-license.xml
View file

@ -79,7 +79,7 @@
License licensed components or the change of license of
existing components to the Apache License.</p>
<p>The following components are currently approved:</p>
<p>This license is approved for the following components:<p>
<ul>
<li>LLVM toolchain and (with LLVM Exceptions) runtime
components.</li>
@ -87,6 +87,18 @@
</ul>
</li>
<li>
<p>The BSD+Patent License is acceptable for use in some cases.
The Core Team must approve the import of new BSD+Patent
License licensed components or the change of license of
existing components to the BSD+Patent License.</p>
<p>This license is approved for the following components:<p>
<ul>
<li>EDK2 derived code related to UEFI functionality</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>
<p>Historically, the phrase 'All Rights Reserved.' was
included in all copyright notices. The BSD releases had it to