73bca3ef97
- comparing 'Linux' vs 'FreeBSD' is comparing apples and fruit: one is just the kernel and the other is a specific distribution. - the license 'debate' is well covered elsewhere - it still references CVS - comparing the development style of '300 committers' vs 'going through the maintainer' is a straw man and doesn't reflect how Linux works (or how BSD works) - the supported platforms list is old and incorrect - the "Extensible Frameworks" section belongs elsewhere - the 'security' section is a feature list, not a comparison and is missing important features etc. Discussed with: mjg |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| articles | ||
| books | ||
| flyer | ||
| htdocs | ||
| share/xml | ||
| Makefile | ||
| Makefile.inc | ||