- comparing 'Linux' vs 'FreeBSD' is comparing apples and fruit: one is
just the kernel and the other is a specific distribution.
- the license 'debate' is well covered elsewhere
- it still references CVS
- comparing the development style of '300 committers' vs 'going through
the maintainer' is a straw man and doesn't reflect how Linux works (or
how BSD works)
- the supported platforms list is old and incorrect
- the "Extensible Frameworks" section belongs elsewhere
- the 'security' section is a feature list, not a comparison and is
missing important features
etc.
Discussed with: mjg
If I understand correctly the build broke because the non-english articles
import from the english version of fbsd-from-scratch.
Remove the translated articles for the articles I removed in English
reasonable to maintain the reference, use the archived docs.
5-roadmap
checkpoint
dialup-firewall
diskless-x
euro
formatting-media
hats (content moved to htdocs/internal)
multi-os
storage-devices
vinum
zip-drive
All of these articles can be found here:
http://docs.freebsd.org/doc/9.0-RELEASE/usr/share/doc/freebsd/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/
No objection from: doc@, www@
translated files. In this way, we will be able to generate the
list of the outdated files automatically.
Obtained from: The FreeBSD Hungarian Documentation Project
Inspired by: The FreeBSD Greek Documentation Project
